Remote Sensing审稿提示词（deepseek生成）

MDPI Review Report Template

中文版

**稿件编号：** [例如：remotesensing-1234567]
**稿件标题：** [此处填写稿件的完整标题]

**审稿人意见：**

**1. 简要总结**
请用一段话简述本文的研究目的、主要贡献以及核心优势。

[在此处填写你的简要总结]

---

**2. 总体评价意见**
*请重点关注稿件的科学内容。意见应足够具体，以便作者能够据此进行修改或回复。*

*（如果是针对 **研究论文**）：* 请指出薄弱环节、假设的可验证性、方法的准确性、是否有缺失的对照组，或数据解释方面的问题。

*（如果是针对 **综述论文**）：* 请评价主题覆盖的全面性、选题的相关性、是否明确了现有知识的空白，以及参考文献的恰当性。

[在此处填写你的总体评价意见]

---

**3. 具体意见**
*请引用具体的行号、表格或图表，指出文中不准确的地方或表述不清的句子。这些意见也应聚焦于科学内容。*

[在此处填写你的具体意见，例如：
- 第125行：关于“......”的陈述与图2展示的数据不符。
- 图3：误差棒代表什么（标准差还是标准误）不够清晰。请在图注中注明。
- 第250行：作者声称得到了结果X，但第2.3节描述的方法似乎无法测量这一参数。
- 表1：缺少浓度数值的单位。]

---

**提醒事项：**
- **无需**评论稿件的格式或英语语言问题（这些问题将由编辑部人员处理）。
- **请勿**在撰写审稿报告的过程中使用生成式人工智能工具或其他大语言模型。

英文版

**Manuscript ID:** [e.g., remotesensing-1234567]
**Title:** [Full title of the manuscript]

**Reviewer's Comments:**

**1. Brief Summary**
Please provide a short paragraph outlining the aim of the paper, its main contributions, and its primary strengths.

[Write your brief summary here]

---

**2. General Concept Comments**
*Please focus your comments on the scientific content. Be specific enough for the authors to be able to respond.*

*(For an **Article**):* Highlight areas of weakness, the testability of the hypothesis, methodological inaccuracies, missing controls, or issues with data interpretation.

*(For a **Review**):* Comment on the completeness of the topic covered, the relevance of the topic to the field, the gap in knowledge identified, and the appropriateness and breadth of the references cited.

[Write your general concept comments here]

---

**3. Specific Comments**
*Please refer to line numbers, tables, or figures to point out inaccuracies within the text or sentences that are unclear. These comments should also focus on the scientific content.*

[Write your specific comments here, e.g.:
- Line 125: The statement "..." is not supported by the data presented in Figure 2.
- Figure 3: It is unclear what the error bars represent (SD or SEM?). Please specify in the caption.
- Line 250: The authors claim X, but the methodology described in Section 2.3 does not seem capable of measuring this parameter.
- Table 1: The units for the concentration are missing.]

---

**Reminder:**
- **Do not** comment on formatting or English language problems (these will be addressed by editorial staff).
- **Do not** use GenAI tools or other large language models (LLMs) in the preparation of this review report.