排序规则引起的冲突问题

最近在工作中碰到一例因排序规则而导致的冲突问题，运行环境是SQL 2008，具体代码如下：

DECLARE @URL VARCHAR(500),
    @startdate DATETIME,
    @enddate DATETIME,
    @Identifier VARCHAR(20);

SELECT @URL = '/articlenet/article.aspx',
       @startdate = '2010-02-01',
       @enddate = '2010-02-28',
       @Identifier = 'id';

SELECT CAST(au.PopulateDate AS date) AS DateViewed
           ,qs.Value
           ,COUNT(1) AS PageViews
           ,COUNT(
              DISTINCT CASE WHEN au.UserId = 6264375 THEN au.FPID
                              ELSE du.UserGUID  END
                 ) AS DistinctUsers
FROM Dim_URL u (NOLOCK)
    JOIN dbo.Agg_User_Archive au  (NOLOCK)
        ON u.URLKey  = au.URLKey
    JOIN Dim_QueryString qs  (NOLOCK)
        ON au.AggUserId  = qs.AggUserId
    JOIN dbo.Dim_UserId du (NOLOCK)
        ON du.UserKey  = au.UserId
WHERE URL  = @URL
    AND au.PopulateDate  > @startdate
    AND au.PopulateDate  < @enddate
    AND qs.Identifier  = @Identifier
GROUP BY CAST(au.PopulateDate AS DATE), Value
ORDER BY DateViewed DESC, Value;

--Msg 457, Level 16, State 1, Line 11
--Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict.

 /*该查询是一个已经编写好的查询语句，只是根据需要我们做出了适当的调整。即新增了一个JOIN表Dim_UserId，然后将CASE子句中THEN后
 面跟的，原来为FPIDKey更换为FPID，ELSE后面的UserId更换为UserGUID。修改后的批处理中语法检查时并没有发现任何错误。执行时出现
 上述错误提示。从错误的提示来分析是因为排序冲突所致，因此查看新增的两个字段是否使用了相同的排序规则。下面是查看语句： */

SELECT o.name,o.object_id,c.name,c.column_id,c.collation_name
FROM sys.columns c
    JOIN sys.objects o
        ON c.object_id = o.object_id
WHERE o.object_id = OBJECT_ID('dbo.Dim_UserId')
    AND c.name = 'UserGUID'
UNION
SELECT o.name,o.object_id,c.name,c.column_id,c.collation_name
FROM sys.columns c
    JOIN sys.objects o
        ON c.object_id = o.object_id
WHERE o.object_id = OBJECT_ID('dbo.Agg_User_Archive')
    AND c.name = 'FPID'
/*
name               object_id      name     column_id   collation_name
------------------ ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------------------
Agg_User_Archive   1613248802   FPID       28          Latin1_General_CS_AI
Dim_UserId         1234819461  UserGUID    2           Latin1_General_BIN
*/

--从查询结果中可以看出，原来是因为两个列使用的不同的排序规则，故在count运算时发生了错误。于是修改语句如下，问题解决。下面仅列出被修改过的语句。

COUNT(DISTINCT CASE WHEN au.UserId = 6264375 THEN au.FPID COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT
                ELSE du.UserGUID  COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT END
      ) AS DistinctUsers

以下列出Collate子句的语法： 
COLLATE { <collation_name> | database_default } 
<collation_name> :: =      { Windows_collation_name } | { SQL_collation_name }

几点注意事项： 
一、排序规则可以在以下几个级别指定： 
1.创建或更改数据库。 
2.创建或更改表列。 
3.投影表达式的排序规则。 
二、COLLATE 子句只能应用于 char、varchar、text、nchar、nvarchar 和 ntext 数据类型。

其它关于排序规则问题请参照本人的其它文章：SQL server 排序规则（COLLATE）
更多参考：http://msdn.microsoft.com/zh-cn/library/ms184391.aspx

 

http://blog.csdn.net/robinson_0612/article/details/5393619