在8000w数据规模上,跑了10w个查询,因为数据生成是有YCSB完成的,而且,key也是随机生成的。重复程度不能够模拟真实的应用。测试的结果无法真实表现出Compaction策略之间的差异。不过,我会验证以下。这次是对SizeTiered影响的测试。SSD随机读真的太给力了。是粗略估计HDD的100倍。测试结果如下:
RunTime(ms) |
103728 |
Throughput(ops/sec) |
9640.598 |
Operations |
1000000 |
AverageLatency(us) |
10313.15 |
MinLatency(us) |
237 |
MaxLatency(us) |
1424988 |
95thPercentileLatency(ms) |
17 |
99thPercentileLatency(ms) |
56 |
RunTime(ms) |
81858 |
Throughput(ops/sec) |
12216.28 |
Operations |
1000000 |
AverageLatency(us) |
8135.523 |
MinLatency(us) |
229 |
MaxLatency(us) |
1103307 |
95thPercentileLatency(ms) |
14 |
99thPercentileLatency(ms) |
34 |

