Pieces0310

取证须让证物说话,莫妄以自我心证来给案情下定论.切忌画靶射箭,为找而找. 取证的根基仰赖经验与判断,在IT各领域的经验愈丰富,愈能看出端倪. 取证须善用工具,但不过度依赖工具.工具只能帮你缩小可能范围,但无法告诉你答案,仍需靠人进行分析判断.

首页 新随笔 联系 订阅 管理

Some said Live View could only boot up images acquired from 32bit OS evidence. I have to say that it's not true. Ok, the best way to prove it is let the evidence speak for themselves~

1. Boot up Windows 7 64bit evidence

 

2. Live View boot up Linux 64bit evidence

 

I think the reason why some forensic guys "believe" that Live View could not boot evidence suessfully are as below:

1.They forgot mounting tools(ex: FTK Imager) requires Administrator privileges to run.

2.They forgot Live View requires Administrator privileges to run.

3.Whenever they saw any terrible word(ike "error","warning","failed") in the Live View message boxs, they will shut Live View down immediately without hesitate. Acutally they should be more patient, let Live View to parse and analyze those partitions. When completed they could use VMWare to open the snapshot and see if it works or not. Remember one very important thing : "Don't jump to conclusions too soon"...some forensics should get rid of such kind of bad habit...

 

It's an Open Source Java-based solution. You guys could take a look at it's website and forums:

http://liveview.sourceforge.net/index.html

http://sourceforge.net/p/liveview/discussion/

By the way, VFC is a commercial solution. In my experience, Live View is better than VFC. Of course it's not 100% guarantee to boot up evidence with Live View(or VFC). Still you have chances fail to boot up and see Blue Death screen...

 

posted on 2015-07-26 16:12  Pieces0310  阅读(459)  评论(0)    收藏  举报