实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
-
实验6: 开源控制器实践——RYU](https://www.cnblogs.com/yjcblogs/p/16803784.html)
一.实验目的
1.能够独立部署RYU控制器;
2.能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理;
3.能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。二、实验环境
Ubuntu 20.04 Desktop amd64
三、实验要求
(一)基本要求
1.搭建下图所示SDN拓扑,协议使用Open Flow 1.0,并连接Ryu控制器,通过Ryu的图形界面查看网络拓扑。
![img]()
- 建立拓扑
![img]()
- 连接ryu控制器
![img]()
- 通过Ryu的图形界面查看网络拓扑,在浏览器中输入地址http://127.0.0.1:8080即可打开ryu的图形界面
![img]()
2.阅读Ryu文档的The First Application一节,运行当中的L2Switch,h1 ping h2或h3,在目标主机使用 tcpdump 验证L2Switch,分析L2Switch和POX的Hub模块有何不同。
- 创建L2Switch.py文件并添加代码
点击查看代码
from ryu.base import app_manager from ryu.controller import ofp_event from ryu.controller.handler import MAIN_DISPATCHER from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_0 class L2Switch(app_manager.RyuApp): OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_0.OFP_VERSION]def init(self, args, **kwargs):
super(L2Switch, self).init(args, **kwargs)@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
def packet_in_handler(self, ev):
msg = ev.msg
dp = msg.datapath
ofp = dp.ofproto
ofp_parser = dp.ofproto_parseractions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofp.OFPP_FLOOD)]
data = None
if msg.buffer_id == ofp.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
data = msg.dataout = ofp_parser.OFPPacketOut(
datapath=dp, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, in_port=msg.in_port,
actions=actions, data = data)
dp.send_msg(out)- h1 ping h2
![img]()
- h1 ping h3
![img]()
- 分析L2Switch和POX的Hub模块有何不同
RYU的L2Switch模块和POX的Hub模块都采用洪泛转发,但不同之处在于:
可以在pox的Hub模块运行时查看流表,而无法在ryu的L2Switch模块运行时查看到流表
-创建L2032002136.py
点击查看代码
from ryu.base import app_manager from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_3 from ryu.controller import ofp_event from ryu.controller.handler import MAIN_DISPATCHER, CONFIG_DISPATCHER from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_clsclass hub(app_manager.RyuApp):
OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_3.OFP_VERSION]def init(self, args, **kwargs):
super(hub, self).init(args, **kwargs)@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER)
def switch_feathers_handler(self, ev):
datapath = ev.msg.datapath
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
ofp_parser = datapath.ofproto_parser# install flow table-miss flow entry
match = ofp_parser.OFPMatch()
actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER, ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)]
# 1\OUTPUT PORT, 2\BUFF IN SWITCH?
self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions)def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions):
# 1\ datapath for the switch, 2\priority for flow entry, 3\match field, 4\action for packet
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
ofp_parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
# install flow
inst = [ofp_parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = ofp_parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority, match=match, instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
def packet_in_handler(self, ev):
msg = ev.msg
datapath = msg.datapath
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
ofp_parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
in_port = msg.match['in_port'] # get in port of the packet# add a flow entry for the packet
match = ofp_parser.OFPMatch()
actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD)]
self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions)# to output the current packet. for install rules only output later packets
out = ofp_parser.OFPPacketOut(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, in_port=in_port, actions=actions)
# buffer id: locate the buffered packet
datapath.send_msg(out)- 运行结果
![img]()
(二)进阶要求
1.阅读Ryu关于simple_switch.py和simple_switch_1x.py的实现,以simple_switch_13.py为例,完成其代码的注释工作,并回答下列问题:点击查看代码
a) 代码当中的mac_to_port的作用是什么?
保存mac地址到交换机端口的映射,为交换机自学习功能提供数据结构进行mac端口的存储b) simple_switch和simple_switch_13在dpid的输出上有何不同?
差别在于:simple_switch直接输出dpid,而simple_switch_13则在dpid前端填充0直至满16位点击查看代码
c) 相比simple_switch,simple_switch_13增加的switch_feature_handler实现了什么功能?
实现了交换机以特性应答消息来响应特性请求的功能。d) simple_switch_13是如何实现流规则下发的?
在接收到packetin事件后,首先获取包学习,交换机信息,以太网信息,协议信息等。若以太网类型是LLDP类型,则不予处理。如果不是,则获取源端口的目的端口和交换机id,先学习源地址对应的交换机的入端口,再查看是否已经学习目的mac地址,如果没有则进行洪泛转发。如果学习过该mac地址,则查看是否有buffer_id,如果有的话,则在添加流表信息时加上buffer_id,向交换机发送流表。e) switch_features_handler和_packet_in_handler两个事件在发送流规则的优先级上有何不同?
switch_features_handler下发流表的优先级比_packet_in_handler的优先级高。2.编程实现和ODL实验的一样的硬超时功能。
- 代码
点击查看代码
# Copyright (C) 2011 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation. # # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. # You may obtain a copy of the License at # # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or # implied. # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License.from ryu.base import app_manager
from ryu.controller import ofp_event
from ryu.controller.handler import CONFIG_DISPATCHER, MAIN_DISPATCHER
from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls
from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_3
from ryu.lib.packet import packet
from ryu.lib.packet import ethernet
from ryu.lib.packet import ether_typesclass SimpleSwitch13(app_manager.RyuApp):
OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_3.OFP_VERSION]def init(self, args, **kwargs):
super(SimpleSwitch13, self).init(args, **kwargs)
self.mac_to_port = {}@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER)
def switch_features_handler(self, ev):
datapath = ev.msg.datapath
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
parser = datapath.ofproto_parser# install table-miss flow entry
#
# We specify NO BUFFER to max_len of the output action due to
# OVS bug. At this moment, if we specify a lesser number, e.g.,
# 128, OVS will send Packet-In with invalid buffer_id and
# truncated packet data. In that case, we cannot output packets
# correctly. The bug has been fixed in OVS v2.1.0.
match = parser.OFPMatch()
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER,
ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)]
self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions)def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions, buffer_id=None, hard_timeout=0):
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
parser = datapath.ofproto_parserinst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS,
actions)]
if buffer_id:
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=buffer_id,
priority=priority, match=match,
instructions=inst, hard_timeout=hard_timeout)
else:
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority,
match=match, instructions=inst, hard_timeout=hard_timeout)
datapath.send_msg(mod)@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
def _packet_in_handler(self, ev):
# If you hit this you might want to increase
# the "miss_send_length" of your switch
if ev.msg.msg_len < ev.msg.total_len:
self.logger.debug("packet truncated: only %s of %s bytes",
ev.msg.msg_len, ev.msg.total_len)
msg = ev.msg
datapath = msg.datapath
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
in_port = msg.match['in_port']pkt = packet.Packet(msg.data)
eth = pkt.get_protocols(ethernet.ethernet)[0]if eth.ethertype == ether_types.ETH_TYPE_LLDP:
# ignore lldp packet
return
dst = eth.dst
src = eth.srcdpid = format(datapath.id, "d").zfill(16)
self.mac_to_port.setdefault(dpid, {})self.logger.info("packet in %s %s %s %s", dpid, src, dst, in_port)
# learn a mac address to avoid FLOOD next time.
self.mac_to_port[dpid][src] = in_portif dst in self.mac_to_port[dpid]:
out_port = self.mac_to_port[dpid][dst]
else:
out_port = ofproto.OFPP_FLOODactions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(out_port)]\
actions_timeout=[]
# install a flow to avoid packet_in next time
if out_port != ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD:
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=in_port, eth_dst=dst, eth_src=src)
# verify if we have a valid buffer_id, if yes avoid to send both
# flow_mod & packet_out
hard_timeout=10
if msg.buffer_id != ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
self.add_flow(datapath, 2, match,actions_timeout, msg.buffer_id,hard_timeout=10)
self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions, msg.buffer_id)
return
else:
self.add_flow(datapath, 2, match, actions_timeout, hard_timeout=10)
self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions)
data = None
if msg.buffer_id == ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
data = msg.dataout = parser.OFPPacketOut(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id,
in_port=in_port, actions=actions, data=data)
datapath.send_msg(out)-
h1 ping h2
![]()
- 建立拓扑
个人总结
这次基本要求倒是中规中矩,没什么感想。而进阶要求难度不小,有些问题需要真正去阅读代码以及查一些资料相结合才能搞明白,花了不少时间,看来如何高效使用搜索引擎也是一门必修课,还有就是发现注释很重要。通过本次实验,也使得我对RYU的控制机制有了深入的认识,同时也对SDN有了更深刻的认识。总之,收获颇丰!
本次实验遇到了TypeError: cannot set 'is_timeout' attribute of immutable type 'TimeoutError'和AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'MutableMapping',通过阅读同学的博客成功解决。
通过本次实验学会了独立部署Ryu控制器,对RYU的控制机制有了更为形象和深入的认识。








浙公网安备 33010602011771号