时间戳在高并发下解决办法
在高并发场景下System.currentTimeMillis()并发问题严重,甚至比创建一个普通对象要耗时的多;在系统中有时候不可避免要打印一些时间戳,但怎么做才更好呢。
代码实现
import java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong; /** * 高并发场景下System.currentTimeMillis()的性能问题的优化 * 时间戳打印建议使用 */ public class SystemClock { private static final String THREAD_NAME = "system.clock"; private static final SystemClock MILLIS_CLOCK = new SystemClock(1); private final long precision; private final AtomicLong now; private SystemClock(long precision) { this.precision = precision; now = new AtomicLong(System.currentTimeMillis()); scheduleClockUpdating(); } public static SystemClock millisClock() { return MILLIS_CLOCK; } private void scheduleClockUpdating() { ScheduledExecutorService scheduler = Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor(runnable -> { Thread thread = new Thread(runnable, THREAD_NAME); thread.setDaemon(true); return thread; }); scheduler.scheduleAtFixedRate(() -> now.set(System.currentTimeMillis()), precision, precision, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS); } public long now() { return now.get(); } }
调用示例
Long start = SystemClock.millisClock().now();
测试对比
public static void main(String[] args) { int times=Integer.MAX_VALUE; long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) { SystemClock.millisClock().now(); } long end = System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("SystemClock Time:" + (end - start) + "毫秒"); long start2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) { System.currentTimeMillis(); } long end2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("SystemCurrentTimeMillis Time:" + (end2 - start2) + "毫秒"); }
输出结果是:
SystemClock Time:2741毫秒
SystemCurrentTimeMillis Time:14072毫秒
五倍的效率
JAVA修炼塔,技术世界的探知与交流,欢迎你的加入-----群号:535296702

浙公网安备 33010602011771号