Technical Committee Weekly Meeting 2016.06.21

Meeting time:   2016.June.21 1:00~2:00

Chairperson:    Thierry Carrez

Meeting summary:

  

1.Add current house rules for reference

  This lists exceptions to the formal votes for various changes

  in the openstack/governance repository. It corresponds to

  house rules as they were proposed to the Newton membership in

  our introductory meeting, with additional wording to cover

  the exceptions proposed by Doug Hellmann at our last meeting.

  Link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330442/1/reference/house-rules.rst

 

2.Update team tags for some projects

  congress: To provide governance as a service across any collection of cloud service. =>team:diverse-affiliation

  solum: Software Development Lifecycle Automation service. =>team:single-vendor

  zaqar: To produce an OpenStack messaging service. =>team:diverse-affiliation

  Link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/332093

 

3.Remove Packaging-Deb project team

  PTL: Monty Taylor

  Desc: Maintain packages for Debian (and other deb based distributions) as a community.

  Status: abondoned

  Reason: I proposed this because Packaging-Deb is the only official project team without any visible activity.

  I'm not in favor of removing this as the project team in question is currently in the middle of good-faith effort to implement the needed things.

  1) the repositories can't be moved without losing existing CI functionality, and fixing that would be a distraction.

  2) this is close to getting the necessary infra support for proper CI within OpenStack.

  3) this effort is deep enough that we wouldn't pursue it (or prioritize it) if the project was not official.

  Agreed: grace period for Packaging-Deb extended to end of August.

  Link: https://review.openstack.org/329430

 

4.Add 'type:horizon-plugin' tag

  Define a new deliverable type tag to describe deliverables

  that are specifically meant to be loaded by Horizon to provide UI for a given project.

  Link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/329479/

 

5.Add 'level playing field' requirement

  From an upstream perspective, I see us as being in the business

  of providing open collaboration playing fields in order to build

  projects to reach the OpenStack Mission. We collectively provide

  resources (infra, horizontal teams, events...) in order to enable that open collaboration.

  Require: 

  The new project shall provide a level and open collaboration playing field

  for all contributors. The project shall not benefit a single vendor, or

  a single vendors product offerings; nor advantage contributors from a

  single vendor organization due to access to source code, hardware,

  resources or other proprietary technology available only to those contributors.

 

6.Open Discussion

  1) We'll have most TC members in Ann Arbor next week for the leadership training, so we'll skip that meeting.

2) Release Coordinator Nominations

======= ============ ================ ========== ========== ==================
Release Coordinator Nominations Open Poll Open Poll Close Geographic Region
======= ============ ================ ========== ========== ==================
M Monty Taylor 2015-06-01 2015-06-08 2015-06-15 N/A
N Monty Taylor 2015-11-08 2015-11-30 2015-12-07 Texas Hill Country
O Monty Taylor 2015-11-08 2015-11-30 2015-12-07 Catalonia
P Monty Taylor 2016-06-22 2016-07-06 2016-07-13 New England
Q Monty Taylor 2016-06-22 2016-07-06 2016-07-13 New South Wales
======= ============ ================ ========== ========== ==================

  Link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/332193

  

posted @ 2016-07-01 12:55  Edisonxiang  阅读(134)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报