List去重方法
方法一:遍历list
循环遍历List,借助Dictionary存储去重的对象
Dictionary<string, Item> result = new Dictionary<string, Item>();
foreach (Item item in list)//list为待去重列表
{
Item temp;
if (!result.TryGetValue(item.name, out temp))
{
result.Add(item.name, item);
}
}
List<Item> result_list = result.Values.ToList();
///Item
public class Item
{
public string name { get; set; }
public string value { get; set; }
}
方法二:ToLookup
利用ToLookup查找,并转为Dictionary
List<Item> result = list.ToLookup(item => item.name).ToDictionary(item => item.Key, item => item.First()).Values.ToList();
///Item
public class Item
{
public string name { get; set; }
public string value { get; set; }
}
方法三:自定义Compare
自定义Compare方法实现
List<Item> result = list.Distinct(new Compare()).ToList();
//compare方法
public class Compare : IEqualityComparer<Item>
{
public bool Equals(Item a, Item b)
{
return a.name == b.name;
}
public int GetHashCode(Item obj)
{
return obj.name.GetHashCode();
}
}
///Item
public class Item
{
public string name { get; set; }
public string value { get; set; }
}
Compare公用方法
public class Compare<T, C> : IEqualityComparer<T>
{
private Func<T, C> _getField;
public Compare(Func<T, C> getfield)
{
this._getField = getfield;
}
public bool Equals(T x, T y)
{
return EqualityComparer<C>.Default.Equals(_getField(x), _getField(y));
}
public int GetHashCode(T obj)
{
return EqualityComparer<C>.Default.GetHashCode(this._getField(obj));
}
}
public static class CommonHelper
{
/// <summary>
/// 自定义Distinct扩展方法
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">要去重的对象类</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="C">自定义去重的字段类型</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">要去重的对象</param>
/// <param name="getfield">获取自定义去重字段的委托</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> MyDistinct<T, C>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Func<T, C> getfield)
{
return source.Distinct(new Compare<T, C>(getfield));
}
}
//调用
list.MyDistinct(s=>s.Id).ToList().ForEach(s => Console.WriteLine(s.ToString()));
方法四:groupby
利用GroupBy分组实现
List<Item> result = list.GroupBy(item => item.name).Select(item => item.First()).ToList();
///Item
public class Item
{
public string name { get; set; }
public string value { get; set; }
}
总结:方法一和方法三去重效率差不多,方法二和方法四去重效率差不多,但是方法一和方法三的效率是方法二和方法四的四倍左右,所以推荐使用方法三。
浙公网安备 33010602011771号