WCF后续之旅（8）：通过WCF Extension 实现与MS Enterprise Library Policy Injection Application Block 的集成

在上一篇文章中，我们通过自定义InstanceProvider实现了WCF和微软Enterprise Library Unity Application Block的集成， 今天我们已相同的方式实现WCF与Enterprise Library的另一个Application Block的集成：Policy Injection Application Block (PIAB)。

PIAB，通过Method Interception的机制实现了AOP(Aspect Oriented Programing)。按照PIAB的编程方式，我们将非业务逻辑，比如Caching、Authorization、Transaction Enlist、Auditing、ExceptionHandling扽等等， 定义在一个个的CallHandler，这些CallHandler通过Attribute或者Configuration的方式应用到目标方法上。关于PIAB的详细介绍，我们参考我的PIAB系列（http://www.cnblogs.com/artech/archive/2008/01/29/1057379.html）。

由于PIAB特殊的实现机制(PIAB实现原理),我们需要通过PIAB的PolicyInjector来创建新的对象或者包装现有的目标对象。只有调用这种能够方式的对象，应用在上面的CallHandler才能被执行。所以WCF和PIAB的核心问题就是如何通过PIAB PolicyInjector来创建新的Service Instance，或者包装已经生成的service instance。在上面一篇文章中，我们通过Unity Container重新定义了InstanceProvider，我们今天的实现方案也是通过自定义InstanceProvider的方式来实现，不是我们需需要通过PolicyInjector来进行对象的创建。

一、创建基于PolicyInjection的InstanceProvider

下面是我们新的InstanceProvider（PolicyInjectionInstanceProvider ）的定义

namespace Artech.WCFExtensions
{
    public class PolicyInjectionInstanceProvider : IInstanceProvider
    {
        private Type _serviceContractType;
        private string _policyInjectorName;

        public PolicyInjectionInstanceProvider(Type serviceContractType, string policyInjectorName)
        {
            this._serviceContractType = serviceContractType;
            this._policyInjectorName = policyInjectorName;
        }
        public object GetInstance(InstanceContext instanceContext, Message message)
        {
            PolicyInjector policyInjector = null;
            if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(this._policyInjectorName))
            {
                policyInjector = new PolicyInjectorFactory().Create();
            }
            else
            {
                policyInjector = new PolicyInjectorFactory().Create(this._policyInjectorName);
            }

            Type serviceType = instanceContext.Host.Description.ServiceType;
            object serviceInstance = Activator.CreateInstance(serviceType);
            if (!this._serviceContractType.IsInterface && !serviceType.IsMarshalByRef && policyInjector is RemotingPolicyInjector)
            {
                return serviceInstance;
            }

            return policyInjector.Wrap(serviceInstance, this._serviceContractType);
        }

        public object GetInstance(InstanceContext instanceContext)
        {
            return this.GetInstance(instanceContext, null);
        }

        public void ReleaseInstance(InstanceContext instanceContext, object instance)
        {
            IDisposable disposable = instance as IDisposable;
            if (disposable != null)
            {
                disposable.Dispose();
            }
        }
    }
}

我们对PolicyInjectionInstanceProvider 的实现进行简单的说明：在PIAB中真正用于创建对象的是PolicyInjector，虽然PIAB中仅仅定义了一种基于Remoting的RemotingPolicyInjector，但是我们可以根据我们的需要实现一些不同Injection方式，比如IL Injection。所以我们定义了一个字段_policyInjectorName在配置中定位我们需要的PolicyInjector。该字段如果为null或者empty，将使用默认的PolicyInjector。PolicyInjection的获取通过下面的代码实现：

PolicyInjector policyInjector = null;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(this._policyInjectorName))
{
    policyInjector = new PolicyInjectorFactory().Create();
}
else
{
    policyInjector = new PolicyInjectorFactory().Create(this._policyInjectorName);
}

能够被RemotingPolicyInjector创建的对象不是满足下面两个条件中的一个：

• Target type实现一个Interface。
• Target Type直接或者间接集成System.MarshalByRefObject.

所以如果不能满足这个条件，我们直接通过反射创建service instance：

Type serviceType = instanceContext.Host.Description.ServiceType;
object serviceInstance = Activator.CreateInstance(serviceType);
if (!this._serviceContractType.IsInterface && !serviceType.IsMarshalByRef && policyInjector is RemotingPolicyInjector)
{
         return serviceInstance;
}

最后我们通过policyInjector 的Wrap方法对service instance进行封装并返回：

return policyInjector.Wrap(serviceInstance, this._serviceContractType);

二、为PolicyInjectionInstanceProvider创建Behavior

我们可以通过ContractBehavior或者EndpointBehavior应用我们定义的PolicyInjectionInstanceProvider 。

I、ContractBehavior：PolicyInjectionBehaviorAttribute

namespace Artech.WCFExtensions
{
    public class PolicyInjectionBehaviorAttribute : Attribute, IContractBehavior
    {
        public string PolicyInjectorName{ get; set; }
        public void AddBindingParameters(ContractDescription contractDescription, ServiceEndpoint endpoint, BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters){ }
        public void ApplyClientBehavior(ContractDescription contractDescription, ServiceEndpoint endpoint, ClientRuntime clientRuntime){ }
        public void ApplyDispatchBehavior(ContractDescription contractDescription, ServiceEndpoint endpoint, DispatchRuntime dispatchRuntime)
        {
            Type serviceContractType = contractDescription.ContractType;
            dispatchRuntime.InstanceProvider = new PolicyInjectionInstanceProvider(serviceContractType, this.PolicyInjectorName);
        }
        public void Validate(ContractDescription contractDescription, ServiceEndpoint endpoint){
    }
}

我们在ApplyDispatchBehavior，通过contractDescription.ContractType获得service contract type，然后创建我们的PolicyInjectionInstanceProvider， 并将其指定成当前DispatchRuntime 的InstanceProvider 。PolicyInjector通过属性PolicyInjectorName进行设置。

II、Endpoint Behavior & Behavior Extension: PolicyInjectionBehavior

namespace Artech.WCFExtensions
{
    public class PolicyInjectionBehavior : IEndpointBehavior
    {
        private string _policyInjectorName;
        public PolicyInjectionBehavior(string policyInjectorName)
        {
            this._policyInjectorName = policyInjectorName;
        }
        public void AddBindingParameters(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters){ }
        public void ApplyClientBehavior(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, ClientRuntime clientRuntime){ }
        public void ApplyDispatchBehavior(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, EndpointDispatcher endpointDispatcher)
        {
            Type serviceContractType = endpoint.Contract.ContractType;
            endpointDispatcher.DispatchRuntime.InstanceProvider = new PolicyInjectionInstanceProvider(serviceContractType, this._policyInjectorName);
        }
        public void Validate(ServiceEndpoint endpoint){ }
    }
}

当前DispatchRuntime的InstanceProvider 在ApplyDispatchBehavior方法中指定，PolicyInjectorName通过配置文件配置。该配置节通过下面的PolicyInjectionBehaviorElement定义：

namespace Artech.WCFExtensions
{
    public class PolicyInjectionBehaviorElement:BehaviorExtensionElement
    {
        [ConfigurationProperty("policyInjectorName",IsRequired = false, DefaultValue = "")]
        public string PolicyInjectorName
        {
            get
            {
                return this["policyInjectorName"] as string;
            }
            set
            {
                this["policyInjectorName"] = value;
            }
        }

        public override Type BehaviorType
        {
            get { return typeof(PolicyInjectionBehavior); }
        }

        protected override object CreateBehavior()
        {
            return new PolicyInjectionBehavior(this.PolicyInjectorName);
        }
    }
}

三、应用我们的PolicyInjectionBehavior

现在模拟一个WCF的场景来应用我们创建的PolicyInjectionBehavior。为了直观我们我们创建一个Timeservice，用于返回当前的系统之间，然后我们运用PIAB的CachingCallHandler。那么我们可以通过返回值是否反映真正的当前时间来判断Policy Injection是否起作用了。我们依然采用我们的4层结构程序构架：

I、Artech.TimeService.Contract

namespace Artech.TimeService.Contract
{
    [ServiceContract]
    [PolicyInjectionBehavior]
    public interface ITime
    {
        [OperationContract]
        DateTime GetCurrentTime();
    }
}

我们先试验ContractBehavior，我们仅仅需要将PolicyInjectionBehaviorAttribute应用到ServiceContract上。

II、Artech.TimeService.Service

namespace Artech.TimeService.Service
{
    public class TimeService:ITime
    {
       [CachingCallHandler]
        public DateTime GetCurrentTime()
        {
            return DateTime.Now;
        }
    }
}

 

我们在GetCurrentTime方法上应用了CachingCallHandlerAttribute，那么在第一次执行该方法的时候，方法返回的结果会被缓存，缓存的Key将会是方法和参数值的列表。后续的执行，将会直接从Cache中获取已经执行过的结果。

III、Artech.TimeService.Hosting

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
    <system.serviceModel>
        <services>
            <service name="Artech.TimeService.Service.TimeService">
                <endpoint behaviorConfiguration="" binding="basicHttpBinding"
                    contract="Artech.TimeService.Contract.ITime" />
                <host>
                    <baseAddresses>
                        <add baseAddress="http://127.0.0.1/timeservice" />
                    </baseAddresses>
                </host>
            </service>
        </services>
    </system.serviceModel>
</configuration>

namespace Artech.TimeService.Hosting
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            using (ServiceHost host = new ServiceHost(typeof(Artech.TimeService.Service.TimeService)))
            {
                host.Opened += delegate
                {
                    Console.WriteLine("Time service has been started up!");
                };
                host.Open();

                Console.Read();
            }
        }
    }
}

 

 

 

 

IV、Artech.TimeService.Client

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
    <system.serviceModel>
        <client>
            <endpoint address="http://127.0.0.1/timeservice" binding="basicHttpBinding"
                contract="Artech.TimeService.Contract.ITime" name="timeservice" />
        </client>
    </system.serviceModel>
</configuration>

 

 

namespace Artech.TimeService.Client
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            using (ChannelFactory<ITime> channelFactory = new ChannelFactory<ITime>("timeservice"))
            {
                ITime proxy = channelFactory.CreateChannel();

                for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
                {
                    Console.WriteLine(proxy.GetCurrentTime());
                   Thread.Sleep(1000);
                }
            }

            Console.Read();
        }
    }
}

下面是最终输出的结果：

从返回的时间都是相同的，我们可以确认caching发挥了作用，如何我们将Contract上[PolicyInjectionBehavior]注释掉。

namespace Artech.TimeService.Contract
{
    [ServiceContract]
   //[PolicyInjectionBehavior]
    public interface ITime
    {
        [OperationContract]
        DateTime GetCurrentTime();
    }
}

我们将会得到这样的结果：

上面我们演示了ContractBehavior的应用，我们接着来演示EndpointBehavior的应用。我们仅仅需要修改Hosting的cnonfiguration就可以了：

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
    <system.serviceModel>
        <behaviors>
            <endpointBehaviors>
                <behavior name="PolicyInjectionBehavior">
                    <PolicyInjectionBehaviorExtension />
                </behavior>
            </endpointBehaviors>
        </behaviors>
        <extensions>
            <behaviorExtensions>
                <add name="PolicyInjectionBehaviorExtension" type="Artech.WCFExtensions.PolicyInjectionBehaviorElement, Artech.WCFExtensions, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null" />
            </behaviorExtensions>
        </extensions>
        <services>
            <service name="Artech.TimeService.Service.TimeService">
                <endpoint behaviorConfiguration="PolicyInjectionBehavior" binding="basicHttpBinding"
                    contract="Artech.TimeService.Contract.ITime" />
                <host>
                    <baseAddresses>
                        <add baseAddress="http://127.0.0.1/timeservice" />
                    </baseAddresses>
                </host>
            </service>
        </services>
    </system.serviceModel>
</configuration>

此时运行我们的程序一样可以得到被返回值被Cache的结果：

 

 

 

作者：Artech
出处：http://artech.cnblogs.com
本文版权归作者和博客园共有，欢迎转载，但未经作者同意必须保留此段声明，且在文章页面明显位置给出原文连接，否则保留追究法律责任的权利。