扩展方法到底做了什么

扩展方法是.net3.5以后出现的一个比较优雅的写法，昨天讨论中有同学提出这也是通过反射实现的，不过我并不这么认为。

扩展方法的定义必须是静态类的静态方法，对一个静态类的静态方法进行反射明显不明智。而且linq to object中大量使用扩展方法，如果是用发射实现方法调用，明显过于笨拙。

那么事实到底如何

先定义一个扩展方法和一个同样功能的非扩展方法

public static class StringHelp
    {

       /// <summary>
        /// 裁减字符串（扩展方法写法）
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="source"></param>
        /// <param name="length"></param>
        /// <returns></returns>
        public static string CutStr(this string source, int length, string lastString)
        {
            if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(source))
                return "";
            if (source.Length > length)
            {
                string result = string.Empty;
                source.ToCharArray().Take(length).ToList().ForEach(p => { result += p.ToString(); });
                return result + lastString;
            }
            else
                return source;
        }
        /// <summary>
        /// 裁减字符串（非扩展方法写法）
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="source"></param>
        /// <param name="length"></param>
        /// <returns></returns>
        public static string CutStrNew(string source, int length, string lastString)
        {
            if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(source))
                return "";
            if (source.Length > length)
            {
                string result = string.Empty;
                source.ToCharArray().Take(length).ToList().ForEach(p => { result += p.ToString(); });
                return result + lastString;
            }
            else
                return source;
        }
    }

 

然后分别进行扩展方法调用，静态方法调用，反射调用三种调用 

 

class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            string str = "hello world!";
            Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch();
            Console.WriteLine(str.CutStr(5, "..."));
            Console.WriteLine(StringHelp.StringHelp.CutStrNew(str, 5, "..."));
            Console.WriteLine(typeof(StringHelp.StringHelp).GetMethod("CutStr").Invoke(null, new object[] { str, 5, "..." }));

            //效率比较
            watch.Start();
            for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
            {
                str.CutStr(5, "...");
            }
            watch.Stop();
            
            Console.WriteLine("1:"+watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);

            watch.Restart();
            for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
            {
                StringHelp.StringHelp.CutStrNew(str, 5, "...");
            }
            watch.Stop();
            Console.WriteLine("2:" + watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);

            watch.Restart();
            for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
            {
                typeof(StringHelp.StringHelp).GetMethod("CutStr").Invoke(null, new object[] { str, 5, "..." });
            }
            watch.Stop();
            Console.WriteLine("3:" + watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);

            Console.Read();
        }
    }

 

 

IL代码

IL_0000:  nop
  IL_0001:  ldstr      "hello world!"
  IL_0006:  stloc.0
  IL_0007:  ldloc.0
  IL_0008:  ldc.i4.5
  IL_0009:  ldstr      "..."
  IL_000e:  call       string [StringHelp]StringHelp.StringHelp::CutStr(string,
                                                                        int32,
                                                                        string)
  IL_0013:  call       void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string)
  IL_0018:  nop
  IL_0019:  ldloc.0
  IL_001a:  ldc.i4.5
  IL_001b:  ldstr      "..."
  IL_0020:  call       string [StringHelp]StringHelp.StringHelp::CutStrNew(string,
                                                                           int32,
                                                                           string)
  IL_0025:  call       void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string)
  IL_002a:  nop
  IL_002b:  ldtoken    [StringHelp]StringHelp.StringHelp
  IL_0030:  call       class [mscorlib]System.Type [mscorlib]System.Type::GetTypeFromHandle(valuetype [mscorlib]System.RuntimeTypeHandle)
  IL_0035:  ldstr      "CutStr"
  IL_003a:  call       instance class [mscorlib]System.Reflection.MethodInfo [mscorlib]System.Type::GetMethod(string)
  IL_003f:  ldnull
  IL_0040:  ldc.i4.3
  IL_0041:  newarr     [mscorlib]System.Object
  IL_0046:  stloc.1
  IL_0047:  ldloc.1
  IL_0048:  ldc.i4.0
  IL_0049:  ldloc.0
  IL_004a:  stelem.ref
  IL_004b:  ldloc.1
  IL_004c:  ldc.i4.1
  IL_004d:  ldc.i4.5
  IL_004e:  box        [mscorlib]System.Int32
  IL_0053:  stelem.ref
  IL_0054:  ldloc.1
  IL_0055:  ldc.i4.2
  IL_0056:  ldstr      "..."
  IL_005b:  stelem.ref
  IL_005c:  ldloc.1
  IL_005d:  callvirt   instance object [mscorlib]System.Reflection.MethodBase::Invoke(object,
                                                                                      object[])
  IL_0062:  call       void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(object)

 

三种调用的方式是这样的：

1、string [StringHelp]StringHelp.StringHelp::CutStr(string,                                                                        int32,                                                                        string)

2、string [StringHelp]StringHelp.StringHelp::CutStrNew(string,
                                                                           int32,
                                                                           string)

3、instance object [mscorlib]System.Reflection.MethodBase::Invoke(object,
                                                                                      object[])

 

 

很明显，并没有使用反射，而是编译器的语法糖，使得调用方法更为简便。在编译时期，编译器会对代码作用域范围内可见的所有静态类，且带this 特征参数的方法进行搜索，

然后透明调用符合特征的方法。

 

那么效率如何呢

 

 

 1、86  2、84  3、313

 效率基本没有，差别，因为其实调用的方式都没有什么区别，而且性能比反射自然要好很多。