SciTech-Matrix Analysis of Management+Theory-管理科学的“矩阵式分析”
-
Constructing a Matrix by using "Mgmt. Approaches" as horizontal axis,
and the vertical axis can be "Any Project" or Any Object? -
We can use this Connections Matrix to do Combinational Analysis?
Early Management, Classical, Behavioral, Quantitative, Contemporary
Phenomeon
Concept
Principle
Interpretations
Definition
Theory
Axiom
SciTech Layers:
Objective: Phenomeon: a objective Process and its Outcomes
Subjective:
- ->Experience: Sensation+Cognition
- ->Concept(Natural+Common part of experiences)
- -> Principle(research+invest)
- -> Interpretations
- -> Definition
- -> Theory
- -> Axiom
Differences:
deed: 1. countable noun. 行为、行动。2. noun. 契约、证书。
act: 1. verb. 行动。2. verb/noun 行为/举止。 3. noun. 法案/令。 4. verb. 担任/充当。
Possibility VS Probability:
Possibility: 强调“过程”可能性,能或不能,
适用于process有非常大Uncertainty;
Probability: 过程有确定的“可能性”而且“可能结果集”是Certain的;
-
Process -> Outcome:
-
In fact, :process 是有这种事实(phenomenon)
-
Indeed, process过程的步骤什么的,行为上
-
Actually,: 通过 process 是能产生possible outcomes, 但不保障完全确定可靠产生,
-
Definitely, 通过 process 是能产生possible outcomes, 而且保障完全确定可靠产生
-
Precisely, 通过process 是能产生possible outcomes, 进一步保障完全确定可靠、精准产生
-
Exactly, 确定以及肯定的outcome: 已提及(指定)outcome, 通过process就确定以及肯定产生这个
-
Completely identical: 完全相同的outcomes, 两次process得到完全一致的两个outcomes.
多次Experiments: Experiment A 与 Experiment B 的 possible outcomes
单次Experiment, Event重复两次或多次,possible outcomes 完全等同。 -
First Group:
mood(情态和语气), 广义地可以理解为说话人对"话语内容真实性"的"态度",包括:-
vagueness(含/模糊性): may be, might be.
-
factness(事实性):
In fact: 事实如此, fact事实 与 theory理论 配对时,
fact 是 "论点" 的 "论据" 立足点.
强调 "说话人" 的 "论点" 确有其 "论据" 事实.Indeed:
actually: 行为如此, act结果/动向 与 theory理论 配对时,
act 是"论点"的"行为与结果",
强调 "说话人" 的 "论点" 确有其 "实际行为与结果", 但"论据"待定。 -
uncertainty(不确定性): Certainly, Certainly NOT/Negative
-
possibility(可能性):
Possibily, Possibily NOT/Negative
Virtually:可能性99%,可以认为就是。 -
definiteness(明确性):
Definitely, Definitely NOT/Negative, -
EXAMPLES:
Is coffee grown in the US.
Actually, coffee is not grown in the US.
But isn't it popular there? Indeed, it is.
In fact, all of it is imported.
-
-
Second Group, Key Takeaways:
- "Could(P.T.F. of the verb 'can')" expresses past ability or present possibility.
The verb "could" as the past tense form of "can" - "Should(P.T.F. of the verb 'shall')" implies advice, expectation, or probability.
The verb "should" as the past tense form of 'shall' - "Would(P.T.F. of the verb 'will')" is used for hypotheticals and future possibilities that may not occur.
The modal auxiliary verb "would" is the past tense form of "will". - Never forget that "would", "should" and "could",
are past tense forms of the verbs: "will", "shall" and "can" respectively.
- "Could(P.T.F. of the verb 'can')" expresses past ability or present possibility.
SciTech Nouns
- Concept: Experience of natural+common part, or based on outcomes of a process, BLACK-BOX approach
- Principle: process, varability, effects between variables. WHITE-BOX appraoch
- Interpretation: more clear than principles, transformed or mapped into other usual theory systems, since its hard to, or even not possible to make a definition for the phenomenon.
- Definition: rigorious research approach(abstracted model, variables and functions, Quanlitative and Quantitative).
- Theory: using System and Contingency research approach and formed a whole theory.
- Axiom: self-evident.
Major Approaches to Management
Early Management, Classical, Behavioral, Quantitative, Contemporary
Early Examples of Management
Adam Smith: The Wealth of Nations
Industrial Revolution

浙公网安备 33010602011771号