实验6：开源控制器实践——RYU
实验6：开源控制器实践——RYU
一、实验目的
1.能够独立部署RYU控制器
2.能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理
3.能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理
二、实验环境
Ubuntu 20.04 Desktop amd64
三、实验要求
（一）基本要求
1.搭建下图所示SDN拓扑，协议使用Open Flow 1.0，并连接Ryu控制器。
2.建立拓扑并连接RYU控制器
3.通过Ryu的图形界面查看网络拓扑。
启动ryu控制器后，在浏览器中输入地址http://127.0.0.1:8080即可打开ryu的图形界面
4.阅读Ryu文档的The First Application一节，运行并使用 tcpdump 验证L2Switch，分析和POX的Hub模块有何不同
from ryu.controller import ofp_event
from ryu.controller.handler import MAIN_DISPATCHER
from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls
from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_0
class L2Switch(app_manager.RyuApp):
OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_0.OFP_VERSION]
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(L2Switch, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
def packet_in_handler(self, ev):
msg = ev.msg
dp = msg.datapath
ofp = dp.ofproto
ofp_parser = dp.ofproto_parser
actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofp.OFPP_FLOOD)]
data = None
if msg.buffer_id == ofp.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
data = msg.data
out = ofp_parser.OFPPacketOut(
datapath=dp, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, in_port=msg.in_port,
actions=actions, data = data)
dp.send_msg(out)
(1)运行并使用 tcpdump 验证L2Switch
- h1 ping h2
- h1 ping h3
结论：RYU的L2Switch模块和POX的Hub模块都采用洪泛转发，但不同之处在于：
可以在pox的Hub模块运行时查看流表，而无法在ryu的L2Switch模块运行时查看到流表
(2)分析和POX的Hub模块有何不同
Hub和L2Switch模块都是洪泛转发，但L2Switch模块下发的流表无法查看，而Hub模块下发的流表可以查看
5.编程修改L2Switch.py，另存为L2032002436.py，使之和POX的Hub模块的变得一致？
from ryu.base import app_manager
from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_3
from ryu.controller import ofp_event
from ryu.controller.handler import MAIN_DISPATCHER, CONFIG_DISPATCHER
from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls
class hub(app_manager.RyuApp):
OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_3.OFP_VERSION]
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(hub, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER)
def switch_feathers_handler(self, ev):
datapath = ev.msg.datapath
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
ofp_parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
# install flow table-miss flow entry
match = ofp_parser.OFPMatch()
actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER, ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)]
# 1\OUTPUT PORT, 2\BUFF IN SWITCH?
self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions)
def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions):
# 1\ datapath for the switch, 2\priority for flow entry, 3\match field, 4\action for packet
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
ofp_parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
# install flow
inst = [ofp_parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)]
mod = ofp_parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority, match=match, instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
def packet_in_handler(self, ev):
msg = ev.msg
datapath = msg.datapath
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
ofp_parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
in_port = msg.match['in_port'] # get in port of the packet
# add a flow entry for the packet
match = ofp_parser.OFPMatch()
actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD)]
self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions)
# to output the current packet. for install rules only output later packets
out = ofp_parser.OFPPacketOut(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, in_port=in_port, actions=actions)
# buffer id: locate the buffered packet
datapath.send_msg(out)
- 结果如下（流表）：
（二）进阶要求
1.阅读Ryu关于simple_switch.py和simple_switch_1x.py的实现，以simple_switch_13.py为例，完成其代码的注释工作
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
# implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
# 引入数据包
from ryu.base import app_manager
from ryu.controller import ofp_event
from ryu.controller.handler import CONFIG_DISPATCHER, MAIN_DISPATCHER
from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls
from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_3
from ryu.lib.packet import packet
from ryu.lib.packet import ethernet
from ryu.lib.packet import ether_types
class SimpleSwitch13(app_manager.RyuApp): #继承了ryu.base.app_manager
OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_3.OFP_VERSION] ## 定义openflow版本，这里调取了在ofproto_v1_3.py里声明的静态变量OFP_VERSION，为OpenFlow1.3版本。
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(SimpleSwitch13, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.mac_to_port = {}
#控制器状态：ryu控制器和交换机交互有4个阶段，详见ryu/ryu/controller/handler.py
@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER)
def switch_features_handler(self, ev):
datapath = ev.msg.datapath #datapath存储交换机的信息
ofproto = datapath.ofproto # ofproto表示使用的OpenFlow版本所对应的ryu.ofproto.ofproto_v1_3
parser = datapath.ofproto_parser # 使用对应版本的ryu.ofproto.ofproto_v1_3_parser来解析协议
# install table-miss flow entry
#
# We specify NO BUFFER to max_len of the output action due to
# OVS bug. At this moment, if we specify a lesser number, e.g.,
# 128, OVS will send Packet-In with invalid buffer_id and
# truncated packet data. In that case, we cannot output packets
# correctly. The bug has been fixed in OVS v2.1.0.
match = parser.OFPMatch() #match指流表项匹配，这里OFPMatch()指不匹配任何信息
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER,
ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)] #actions表示匹配成功不缓存数据包并发送给控制器
self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions) #add_flow是添加流表项的函数,目的为下发流表。
#add_flow()函数作用是增加流表项；
'''add_flow()增加流表项
datapath：指定的 Switch
priority：此规则的优先权
match：此规则的 Match 条件
actions：动作'''
def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions, buffer_id=None):
# 获取交换机信息
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
# 对action进行包装
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS,
actions)]
# 判断是否存在buffer_id，并生成mod对象
if buffer_id:
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=buffer_id,
priority=priority, match=match,
instructions=inst)
else:
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority,
match=match, instructions=inst)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
# 处理PacketIn事件
@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
def _packet_in_handler(self, ev):
# If you hit this you might want to increase
# the "miss_send_length" of your switch
if ev.msg.msg_len < ev.msg.total_len: #传输出错，打印debug信息
self.logger.debug("packet truncated: only %s of %s bytes",
ev.msg.msg_len, ev.msg.total_len)
#从接收到的Packet_In报文中取出各种信息，如果报文是lldp报文，忽略它。随后用此dpid（交换机id)初始化mac_to_port，并在日志打印此Packet_In的基本信息。
msg = ev.msg
datapath = msg.datapath
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
in_port = msg.match['in_port']
pkt = packet.Packet(msg.data)
eth = pkt.get_protocols(ethernet.ethernet)[0]
if eth.ethertype == ether_types.ETH_TYPE_LLDP:
# ignore lldp packet
return
dst = eth.dst
src = eth.src
dpid = format(datapath.id, "d").zfill(16)
self.mac_to_port.setdefault(dpid, {}) # 学习包的源地址，和交换机上的入端口绑定
self.logger.info("packet in %s %s %s %s", dpid, src, dst, in_port)
# learn a mac address to avoid FLOOD next time.
self.mac_to_port[dpid][src] = in_port #交换机自学习，取来往数据包的交换机id、源mac和入端口绑定来构造表。
# 查看是否已经学习过该目的mac地址
if dst in self.mac_to_port[dpid]: #若在表中找到出端口信息，指示出端口
out_port = self.mac_to_port[dpid][dst]
# 否则，洪泛
else:
out_port = ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(out_port)]
# 下发流表避免下次触发 packet in 事件
if out_port != ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD:
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=in_port, eth_dst=dst, eth_src=src)
# verify if we have a valid buffer_id, if yes avoid to send both
# flow_mod & packet_out
if msg.buffer_id != ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions, msg.buffer_id)#add_flow函数内部就已发送了Flow_mod报文,后面不用send_msg()
return
else:
self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions)#若没有buffer_id，发送的Flow_Mod报文就无需要带上buffer_id，但是下一步要再发送一个Packet_out报文带上原数据包信息。
data = None
if msg.buffer_id == ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
data = msg.data
#发送Packet_out数据包
out = parser.OFPPacketOut(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id,
in_port=in_port, actions=actions, data=data)
datapath.send_msg(out) # 发送流表
并回答下列问题：
a) 代码当中的mac_to_port的作用是什么？
学习mac地址，保存mac地址到交换机端口的映射，就不使用洪泛转发
b) simple_switch和simple_switch_13在dpid的输出上有何不同？
- 在simple_switch_13.py中为
dpid = format(datapath.id, "d").zfill(16) - 在simple_switch.py中为
dpid = datapath.id - 在simple_switch_13.py中使用了zfill() 方法返回指定长度为16的字符串，原字符串右对齐，前面填充0；而simple_switch.py直接输出dpid
c) 相比simple_switch，simple_switch_13增加的switch_feature_handler实现了什么功能？
增加了实现交换机以特性应答消息响应特性请求功能
d) simple_switch_13是如何实现流规则下发的？
在触发PacketIn事件后，首先解析相关数据结构，获取协议信息、获取源端口、包学习，交换机信息，以太网信息，等。如果以太网类型是LLDP类型，则忽略。如果不是LLDP类型，则获取目的端口和源端口还有交换机id，然后进行交换机自学习，先学习源地址对应的交换机的入端口，再查看是否已经学习目的mac地址，如果没有就洪泛转发。如果学习过，则查看是否有buffer_id，如果有则在添加流时加上buffer_id，向交换机发送数据包和流表。
2.编程实现和ODL实验的一样的硬超时功能。(自动)
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
# implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
from ryu.base import app_manager
from ryu.controller import ofp_event
from ryu.controller.handler import CONFIG_DISPATCHER, MAIN_DISPATCHER
from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls
from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_3
from ryu.lib.packet import packet
from ryu.lib.packet import ethernet
from ryu.lib.packet import ether_types
class SimpleSwitch13(app_manager.RyuApp):
OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_3.OFP_VERSION]
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(SimpleSwitch13, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.mac_to_port = {}
@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER)
def switch_features_handler(self, ev):
datapath = ev.msg.datapath
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
# install table-miss flow entry
#
# We specify NO BUFFER to max_len of the output action due to
# OVS bug. At this moment, if we specify a lesser number, e.g.,
# 128, OVS will send Packet-In with invalid buffer_id and
# truncated packet data. In that case, we cannot output packets
# correctly. The bug has been fixed in OVS v2.1.0.
match = parser.OFPMatch()
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER,
ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)]
self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions)
def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions, buffer_id=None, hard_timeout=0):
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS,
actions)]
if buffer_id:
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=buffer_id,
priority=priority, match=match,
instructions=inst, hard_timeout=hard_timeout)
else:
mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority,
match=match, instructions=inst, hard_timeout=hard_timeout)
datapath.send_msg(mod)
@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
def _packet_in_handler(self, ev):
# If you hit this you might want to increase
# the "miss_send_length" of your switch
if ev.msg.msg_len < ev.msg.total_len:
self.logger.debug("packet truncated: only %s of %s bytes",
ev.msg.msg_len, ev.msg.total_len)
msg = ev.msg
datapath = msg.datapath
ofproto = datapath.ofproto
parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
in_port = msg.match['in_port']
pkt = packet.Packet(msg.data)
eth = pkt.get_protocols(ethernet.ethernet)[0]
if eth.ethertype == ether_types.ETH_TYPE_LLDP:
# ignore lldp packet
return
dst = eth.dst
src = eth.src
dpid = format(datapath.id, "d").zfill(16)
self.mac_to_port.setdefault(dpid, {})
self.logger.info("packet in %s %s %s %s", dpid, src, dst, in_port)
# learn a mac address to avoid FLOOD next time.
self.mac_to_port[dpid][src] = in_port
if dst in self.mac_to_port[dpid]:
out_port = self.mac_to_port[dpid][dst]
else:
out_port = ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD
actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(out_port)]\
actions_timeout=[]
# install a flow to avoid packet_in next time
if out_port != ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD:
match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=in_port, eth_dst=dst, eth_src=src)
# verify if we have a valid buffer_id, if yes avoid to send both
# flow_mod & packet_out
hard_timeout=10
if msg.buffer_id != ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
self.add_flow(datapath, 2, match,actions_timeout, msg.buffer_id,hard_timeout=10)
self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions, msg.buffer_id)
return
else:
self.add_flow(datapath, 2, match, actions_timeout, hard_timeout=10)
self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions)
data = None
if msg.buffer_id == ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
data = msg.data
out = parser.OFPPacketOut(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id,
in_port=in_port, actions=actions, data=data)
datapath.send_msg(out)
四、个人总结
本次实验难度适中，通过本次实验，我了解了ryu的基础应用，初步了解了RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理和RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。并在对比上次实验POX与这次实验RYU的实验操作，我理解了ryu与pox转发的流表的区别，pox是直接向交换机发送流表项的，而ryu要经过处理packet_in事件后，才向交换机下发流表。并且明白了在用Ryu的L2Switch模块下发流表时，可以看到洪泛现像，但是在交换机上没有看到流表。
- 遇到的问题：打开L2032002436.py和timeout.py，构建拓扑后pingall不通
解决方法：猜想可能跟Openflow协议有关，于是构建拓扑的命令改成sudo mn --topo=single,3 --mac --controller=remote,ip=127.0.0.1,port=6653 --switch ovsk,即删除protocols=OpenFlow10，成功ping通。
