更高效的MergeSort--稍微优化
0. 简介
本文简要介绍一下比传统MergeSort更高效的算法,在原来的算法Merge基础上,少发生一半拷贝。欢迎探讨,感谢阅读。
原文链接如下:http://loverszhaokai.com/posts/More-Efficient-MergeSort/
1. Reference
原文链接
Introuction to Algorithms
https://github.com/loverszhaokai/ALG/blob/master/src/sort.cc
2. MergeSort
void merge(int a[], int b[], const int left, const int middle,
const int right) {
int li, ri, i;
li = left;
ri = middle + 1;
i = 0;
while (li <= middle && ri <= right) {
if (a[li] < a[ri])
b[i++] = a[li++];
else
b[i++] = a[ri++];
}
while (li <= middle)
b[i++] = a[li++];
while (ri <= right)
b[i++] = a[ri++];
}
void copy(int dst[], int dleft, int src[], int sleft, int sright) {
memcpy(dst + dleft, src + sleft,
sizeof(int) * (sright - sleft + 1));
}
void _merge_sort(int a[], int b[], const int left, const int right) {
if (left >= right)
return;
int middle = (left + right) / 2;
_merge_sort(a, b, left, middle);
_merge_sort(a, b, middle + 1, right);
merge(a, b, left, middle, right);
copy(a, left, b, 0, right - left);
}
void merge_sort(int a[], const int size) {
int *b = (int *)malloc(size * sizeof(int));
_merge_sort(a, b, 0, size - 1);
free(b);
}
3. More Efficient MergeSort
We can save some time by copy half when merge(). In merge(), we copy from
left to right, but in MergeKai() we can only copy from left to
middle. The merge() has NlgN duplications which the MergeKai() has
1/2 * NlgN duplications.

normal merge sort

more efficient merge sort
Just as the previous example, the efficient merge sort does not need to copy
1, 3, 7, 8 to the assit array.
// Merge the two list in [left, mid], and (mid, right]. Then, write
// the result to [left, right]
static void MergeKai(int a[], int assist[], const int left,
const int mid, const int right) {
int l = left;
int r = mid + 1;
int assist_index = 0;
// Copy [left, mid] to assit[0, mid - left]
memcpy(assist, a + left, (mid - left + 1) * sizeof(int));
while (assist_index <= mid - left && r <= right) {
if (assist[assist_index] <= a[r]) {
a[l++] = assist[assist_index++];
continue;
} else if (assist[assist_index] > a[r]) {
a[l++] = a[r++];
}
}
while (assist_index <= mid - left) {
a[l++] = assist[assist_index++];
}
while (r <= right) {
a[l++] = a[r++];
}
}
static void MergeSortKaiImpl(int a[], int assist[], const int left,
const int right) {
if (left >= right) {
return;
}
const int mid = (left + right) / 2;
MergeSortKaiImpl(a, assist, left, mid);
MergeSortKaiImpl(a, assist, mid + 1, right);
MergeKai(a, assist, left, mid, right);
}
void MergeSortKai(int a[], const int size) {
int* assist= (int *)malloc(size * sizeof(int));
MergeSortKaiImpl(a, assist, 0, size - 1);
free(assist);
}
4. Experiments
source:
https://github.com/loverszhaokai/ALG/blob/master/src/sort.cc
https://github.com/loverszhaokai/ALG/blob/master/test/sort_test.cc
result:
It takes 1524.61 ms to generate arrays: 1000000 * 20
Sort Function Total Run Time Array Size
---------------------------------------------------------------------
merge_sort_iteratively 826 ms 1000000 * 20
merge_sort 840 ms 1000000 * 20
MergeSortIterativelyKai 826 ms 1000000 * 20
MergeSortKai 809 ms 1000000 * 20
It takes 15028.2 ms to generate arrays: 10000000 * 20
Sort Function Total Run Time Array Size
---------------------------------------------------------------------
merge_sort_iteratively 8717 ms 10000000 * 20
merge_sort 8820 ms 10000000 * 20
MergeSortIterativelyKai 8425 ms 10000000 * 20
MergeSortKai 8389 ms 10000000 * 20
It takes 1929.31 ms to generate arrays: 100000 * 200
Sort Function Total Run Time Array Size
---------------------------------------------------------------------
merge_sort_iteratively 1245 ms 100000 * 200
merge_sort 1347 ms 100000 * 200
MergeSortIterativelyKai 1246 ms 100000 * 200
MergeSortKai 1275 ms 100000 * 200
作者:loverszhaokai
出处:http://www.cnblogs.com/lovers
本文采用知识共享署名-非商业性使用-相同方式共享 2.5 中国大陆许可协议进行许可,欢迎转载,但未经作者同意必须保留此段声明,且在文章页面明显位置给出原文连接。
浙公网安备 33010602011771号