
nothing no very good.
1.look at shuruo.html,after display:inline-block; li's width as the content; So we can learn block element's width as his father,or as the content;
2.if(oList.style.display == 'block'){
oList.style.display = 'none';
}else{
oList.style.display = 'block';
}
better:
oList.style.display == 'block'? 'none':'block';

almost the same
1.to keep it beautiful in html,I made every line not very long;but when alert its innerHTML ,the blank is ungly,I use this.innerHTML.replace(/[\r\n]/g,""); it does not work? I do not know,look at clickDiv1.html.

1.use nagative margin to be center: not only the left and top should be 50%,but margin-top:-height;margin-left:-width; 2.close button make mine:<div id='alert'> <div id='head'> <div id='close'></div> </div> </div> better: <div id="win" ><h2><span id="close">×</span></h2></div> 3.遮罩 div:width height 100%; opacity:0.5; when onclick:block;or none; 4.text-align :right; let content to be right ,do not always use position.

1.str become array:str.split(',')
2.正则??this.value.replace(/[^(\d)|(,)]/,"")

1.only block can add width and text-align

1.mine:use<img>,<img>and <img> born ,have distance better:use <li>,no distance original 2.use total width to contorl content to go to next line,and the same time you'b better use float ; 3.this function emphsize on margin, father and son ,son and son son:margin-top,margin-right father:padding-left padding-bottom

1.每个动作下一步的状态要想一想;例如,就不需要mouseout,加了之后,没有鼠标的时候应该是什么样子呢
2.2行文本不知道怎么换行,《strong》

1.小图标是我画的,巨丑,哈哈
2.background-color如何和background-image 同时存在并同时work
wrong:background-color:#####;background:url()
right:background:#ced3d7 url(img/ico.gif) 180px 15px no-repeat;border-color:#fff #e9edf2;

showpic 1. var oLi = document.getElementsByTagName('li'); for(var i=0;i<oLi.length;i++){ oLi[i].onmouseover = function(){ this.index = i; var oSpan = this.getElementsByTagName('span')[0]; var oImg = this.getElementsByTagName('img')[0]; oSpan.style.display = 'none'; oImg.style.display = 'block'; } ###below is better,directly get element from list var oLi = document.getElementsByTagName("li"); var oA = document.getElementsByTagName("a"); var oImg = document.getElementsByTagName("img"); for (var i = 0; i < oLi.length; i++) { oA[i].index = oImg[i].index = i; oA[i].onmouseover = function() { oLi[this.index].className = "zindex"; oImg[this.index].style.display = "block";
};
2.<div>
<ul>
<li>
li{float:left},if you want ul include li ,you must add ul:after{clear:both;}

1.oImg.src 2.特地用 for(var i=0;i<oLi.length;i++){
![]()
oLi[i].onclick = function(){ check_all(true); check_all(false); } } ///// function check_all(arg){ for(var i=0;i<oLi.length;i++){ if(oLi[i].checked !==arg){ return 0; } } if(arg){ oSpan.innerHTML = '全不选'; oAll.checked = true; } if(!arg){ oSpan.innerHTML = '全选'; oAll.checked = false; } } check 行为理论是一次的,但这样就必须进行了2次,结果是没问题,但感觉很奇怪;下面的优点: 1.利用好了 &&,在oLi[i].checked 为真时才加1 2.利用好了只有所有li的check为真时,oAll才为真,一个li不为真都不行 3.三元表达式 var isCheckAll = function () { for (var i = 1, n = 0; i < oLi.length; i++) { oLi[i].checked && n++ } oAll.checked = n == oLi.length - 1; oSpan.innerHTML = oAll.checked ? "全不选" : "全选" }; ///////////////////////////////////////////////////// 要很好的分析逻辑关系,用心就会发现li的真假和oAll同步,省略很多事 oAll.onclick = function(){ if (oAll.checked){ for(var i=0;i<oLi.length;i++){ oLi[i].checked = true; } check_all(true); } else{ for(var i=0;i<oLi.length;i++){ oLi[i].checked = false; } check_all(false); } } //// oAll.onclick = function(){ for(var i=0;i<oLi.length;i++){ oLi[i].checked = oAll.checked; } isCheckAll(); }

浙公网安备 33010602011771号