﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>博客园-yeerh-最新评论</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/CommentsRSS.aspx</link><description /><language>zh-cn</language><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:29:48 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:29:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>cnblogs</generator><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/29/2219035.html#2282557</link><dc:creator>Kudy&amp;#178;&amp;#186;&amp;#185;&amp;#178;</dc:creator><author>Kudy&amp;#178;&amp;#186;&amp;#185;&amp;#178;</author><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:40:24 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/29/2219035.html#2282557</guid><description><![CDATA[@灵感之源
我自己今天也进行了测试，fast是本人的约1.5倍，但是它并没有不区分大小写、可跳字符、关键词排序和自定义关键词替换的功能<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">Kudy&#178;&#186;&#185;&#178;</a> 2011-12-29 19:40 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/29/2219035.html#2282557#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2276104</link><dc:creator>边城浪</dc:creator><author>边城浪</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:20:20 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2276104</guid><description><![CDATA[@灵感之源
准备性是一样的.
tire的例子中我加入了简繁转换, 简单改一下,也可以支持大小写不敏感.
还可以过滤掉干扰字符.. 扩展方便很多.<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">边城浪</a> 2011-12-21 21:20 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2276104#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275909</link><dc:creator>灵感之源</dc:creator><author>灵感之源</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:46:32 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275909</guid><description><![CDATA[测试例子，fast的速度是tri的2倍。

如果关键字比较少，顶多几百个，那应该用fast。

但如果追求准确性，应该用tri？<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">灵感之源</a> 2011-12-21 16:46 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275909#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275900</link><dc:creator>灵感之源</dc:creator><author>灵感之源</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:41:04 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275900</guid><description><![CDATA[@@秋
啥是筛选效果？准确性吗<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">灵感之源</a> 2011-12-21 16:41 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275900#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275604</link><dc:creator>@秋</dc:creator><author>@秋</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 04:46:01 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275604</guid><description><![CDATA[@灵感之源
但是筛选效果没有这个好<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">@秋</a> 2011-12-21 12:46 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275604#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275346</link><dc:creator>灵感之源</dc:creator><author>灵感之源</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:37:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275346</guid><description><![CDATA[@帅哥Kudy

我刚才测试，yeerh的速度是你的3倍<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">灵感之源</a> 2011-12-21 09:37 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/21/2219035.html#2275346#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/20/2219035.html#2275062</link><dc:creator>帅哥Kudy</dc:creator><author>帅哥Kudy</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:03:46 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/20/2219035.html#2275062</guid><description><![CDATA[http://www.cnblogs.com/kudy/archive/2011/12/19/2293781.html　这个绝对高效~<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">帅哥Kudy</a> 2011-12-20 21:03 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/12/20/2219035.html#2275062#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/10/21/2219035.html#2224884</link><dc:creator>通心菜</dc:creator><author>通心菜</author><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:47:57 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/10/21/2219035.html#2224884</guid><description><![CDATA[马克啊马克必须的<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">通心菜</a> 2011-10-21 17:47 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/10/21/2219035.html#2224884#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/10/21/2219035.html#2224850</link><dc:creator>边城浪</dc:creator><author>边城浪</author><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:22:25 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/10/21/2219035.html#2224850</guid><description><![CDATA[@kiminozo
这种优化的方式在脏字过滤方面确实比tire快。
因为一般过滤的脏字不会太多。我在项目中应用的大概也就2000多个

但是在切词和关键字查找方面就不确定了。
这个跟关键词的多少有关，如果比较多。tire树肯定更有优势。
测试代码中也有种方案是用tire树实现。<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">边城浪</a> 2011-10-21 17:22 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/10/21/2219035.html#2224850#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:再谈脏字过滤（基于hash的优化算法）</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/10/21/2219035.html#2224845</link><dc:creator>边城浪</dc:creator><author>边城浪</author><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:17:40 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/10/21/2219035.html#2224845</guid><description><![CDATA[@andylouis
谢谢支持。。<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/" target="_blank">边城浪</a> 2011-10-21 17:17 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/yeerh/archive/2011/10/21/2219035.html#2224845#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item></channel></rss>
