﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>博客园-穿著`ea用EA做SA-随笔分类-系統分析心得與體悟</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/category/105319.html</link><description>Enterprise Architect使用心得,ERP,系統分析,技術文件,閱讀筆記</description><language>zh-cn</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:46:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:46:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>在SQL裡進行多值比較</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/30/978526.html</link><dc:creator>Justine</dc:creator><author>Justine</author><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/30/978526.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/978526.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/30/978526.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/commentRss/978526.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/services/trackbacks/978526.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 摘要: 介紹一個滿特別的SQL 語法<br>(此為鼎新 TipTop的4GL程式碼)<br><br>這個SQL主要是在數張核價單資訊中，取得今日之前的最後核價單據(依生效日pmj09來判斷)<br>若有同一天核價的單據，即取最大的核價單單號(pmi01)&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href='http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/30/978526.html'>阅读全文</a><img src ="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/aggbug/978526.html?type=1" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://dearjustine.cnblogs.com/" target="_blank">Justine</a> 2007-11-30 16:46 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/30/978526.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>我們有能力做，但不代表我們需要做。</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/28/975030.html</link><dc:creator>Justine</dc:creator><author>Justine</author><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/28/975030.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/975030.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/28/975030.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/commentRss/975030.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/services/trackbacks/975030.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 摘要: 最近花了不少時間在分析目前的流程及系統設計。關於採購系統的訂價核價取價方式，著實為了分析各欄位所帶來的影響傷透腦筋。任何的變更都需要被管控。稽核內控方面都要考慮。採購行為的彈性及廠商訂...&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href='http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/28/975030.html'>阅读全文</a><img src ="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/aggbug/975030.html?type=1" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://dearjustine.cnblogs.com/" target="_blank">Justine</a> 2007-11-28 08:53 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/28/975030.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>重構?老程式與好程式</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/18/963059.html</link><dc:creator>Justine</dc:creator><author>Justine</author><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 02:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/18/963059.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/963059.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/18/963059.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/commentRss/963059.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/services/trackbacks/963059.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 摘要: 從軟體開發產業進入到User端。原本的工作以系統開發較為吃重，而現在，所有的工作將以維護為主。開發的時候，我認為寫程式寫軟體是一種美妙的藝術。什麼重構、預構、DesignPatter等等...&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href='http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/18/963059.html'>阅读全文</a><img src ="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/aggbug/963059.html?type=1" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://dearjustine.cnblogs.com/" target="_blank">Justine</a> 2007-11-18 10:56 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/11/18/963059.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>關於薪資</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/10/30/942398.html</link><dc:creator>Justine</dc:creator><author>Justine</author><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/10/30/942398.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/942398.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/10/30/942398.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/commentRss/942398.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/services/trackbacks/942398.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 摘要: 早上在一名網友的blog中看到他寫下的感慨。踏入社會工作一段時間後，便愈來愈重視薪資。那兒薪資高就往那兒去。漸漸地就忽視了一些應該慢慢要累積的經驗和基礎。和朋友一起經營工作室的時候，他...&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href='http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/10/30/942398.html'>阅读全文</a><img src ="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/aggbug/942398.html?type=1" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://dearjustine.cnblogs.com/" target="_blank">Justine</a> 2007-10-30 08:51 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/10/30/942398.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>需求執行方式</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/09/06/884821.html</link><dc:creator>Justine</dc:creator><author>Justine</author><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/09/06/884821.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/884821.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/09/06/884821.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/comments/commentRss/884821.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/services/trackbacks/884821.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 摘要: from[矇矇的秘密基地]圖1、循序式的開發流程一般軟體人員，不習慣模糊不清、不確定性，所以需求的分析，一定要到...&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href='http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/09/06/884821.html'>阅读全文</a><img src ="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/aggbug/884821.html?type=1" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://dearjustine.cnblogs.com/" target="_blank">Justine</a> 2007-09-06 19:58 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/dearjustine/archive/2007/09/06/884821.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item></channel></rss>