IP Route Management-超好文章

Appendix D. IP Route Management

      Routing and understanding routing in an IP network is one of the      fundamentals you will need to grasp the flexibility of IP networking,      and services which run on IP networks.  It is not enough to address the      machines and mix yourself a dirty martini.  You'll need to verify that      the machine has a route to any network with which it needs to exchange      IP packets.   

      One key element to remember when designing networks, viewing routing      tables, debugging networking problems, and viewing network traffic on      the wire is that IP routing is stateless      [46].      This means that every time a new packet hits the routing stage, the      router makes an independent decision about where to send this      packet.   

      In this section, we'll look at the tools available to manipulate and      view the routing table(s).  We'll start with the well known routecommand, and move      on to the increasingly used ip      route and ip      rule tools which are part of the      iproute2 package.   



[46          For those who have some doubt, netfilter provides a connection          tracking mechanism for packets passing through a linux router.  This          connection tracking, however, is independent of routing.  It is          important to not conflate the packet filtering connection tracking          statefulness with the statelessness of IP routing.  For an example          of a complex networking setup where netfilter's statefulness and the          statelessness of IP routing collide, see          Section 10.4, “Multiple Connections to the Internet”.       

 

 
 
 
 
 

D.1. route

        In the same way that        ifconfig is        the venerable utility for IP address management,        route is a tremendously useful command for        manipulating and displaying IP routing tables.     

        Here we'll look at several tasks you can perform with        route.  You can display routesadd routes (most importantly, the       default route),        remove routes, and examine the routing cache.        I will switch between traditional and CIDR notation for network        addressing in this (and subsequent) sections, so the reader unaware of        these notations is encouraged to refer liberally to the links provided        in Section I.1.3, “General IP Networking Resources”.     

        When using route and ip route on        the same machine, it is important to understand that not all routing        table entries can be shown with route.  The key        distinction is that route only displays        information in the main routing table.  NAT routes, and routes in        tables other than the main routing table must be managed and viewed        separately with the ip        route tool.     

D.1.1. Displaying the routing table with route

          By far the simplest and most common task one performs with          route is           viewing the routing table.  On a single-homed desktop like          tristan, the routing          table will be very simple, probably comprised of only a few routes.          Compare this to a complex routing table on a host with multiple          interfaces and static routes to internal networks, such as          masq-gw.  It is by using          the route command that you can determine where a          packet goes when it leaves your machine.       

Example D.1. Viewing a simple routing table with route

[root@tristan]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.99.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

          In the simplest routing tables, as in          tristan's case, you'll          see three separate routes.  The route which is customarily present          on all machines (and which I'll not remark on after this) is the          route to the loopback interface.  The loopback interface is an IP          interface completely local to the host itself.  Most commonly,          loopback is configured as a single IP address in a class A-sized          network.  This entire network has been set aside for use on loopback          devices.  The address used is usually 127.0.0.1/8, and the device          name under all default installations of linux I have seen is          lo.  It is not at all unheard of for people to          host services on loopback which are intended only for consumption on          that machine, e.g., SMTP on tcp/25.       

          The remaining two lines define how           tristan should reach any          other IP address anywhere on the Internet.  These two routing table          entries divide the world into two different categories: a locally          reachable network (192.168.99.0/24) and everything else.  If an          address falls within the 192.168.99.0/24 range,           tristan knows it can          reach the IP range directly on the wire, so any packets bound for          this range will be pushed out onto the local media.       

          If the packet falls in any other range          tristan will consult its          routing table and find no single route that matches.  In this case,          the default route functions as a terminal choice.  If no other route          matches, the packet will be forwarded to this destination address,          which is usually a router to another set of networks and routers          (which eventually lead to the Internet).       

          Viewing a complex routing table is no more difficult than viewing a          simple routing table, although it can be a bit more diffiult to          read, interpret, and sometimes even find the route you wish to          examine.       

Example D.2. Viewing a complex routing table with route

[root@masq-gw]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0 0 eth3 205.254.211.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2 192.168.98.0 192.168.99.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2 10.38.0.0 192.168.100.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth3 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 205.254.211.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1

          The above routing table shows a more complex set of static routes          than one finds on a single-homed host.  By comparing the network          mask of the routes above, we can see that the network mask is listed          from the most specific to the least specific.  Refer to          Section 4.5, “Route Selection” for more discussion.       

          A quick glance down this routing table also provides us with a good          deal of knowledge about the topology of the network.  Immediately we          can identify four separate Ethernet interfaces, 3 locally connected          class C sized networks, and one tiny subnet (192.168.100.0/30).  We          can also determine that there are two networks reachable via static          routes behind internal routers.       

          Now that we have taken a quick glance at the output from the route          command, let's examine a bit more systematically what it's reporting          to us.       

D.1.2. Reading route's output

          For this discussion refer to the network map in the appendix, and          also to Example D.2, “Viewing a complex routing table withroute”.          route is a venerable command, one which can          manipulate routing tables for protocols other than IP.  If you wish          to know what other protocols are supported, try route          --help at your leisure.  Fortunately,          routedefaults to inet (IPv4) routes if no other          address family is specified.       

          By combining the values in columns one and three you can determine          the destination network or host address.  The first line in           masq-gw's routing table          shows 192.168.100.0/255.255.255.252, which is more conveniently          written in CIDR notation as 192.168.100.0/30.  This is the smallest          possible network according to RFC 1878.  The          only two useable addresses are 192.168.100.1           (service-router)          and 192.168.100.2          (masq-gw).       

          The second column holds the IP address of the gateway to the          destination if the destination is not a locally connected network.          If there is a value other than 0.0.0.0 in this field, the kernel          will address the outbound packet for this device (a router of some          kind) rather than directly for the destination.  The column after          the netmask column (Flags) should always contain a          G for destination not locally connected to the          linux machine.       

          The fields Metric, Ref and Use are not generally used in simple or          even moderately complex routing tables, however, we will discuss the          Use column further in Section D.1.3, “Using route to display the routing cache”.       

          The final field in the route output contains the          name of the interface through which the destination is reachable.          This can be any interface known to the kernel which has an IP          address.  In Example D.2, “Viewing a complex routing table with route”we can          learn immediately that 192.168.98.0/24 is reachable through          interface eth2.       

          After this brief examination of the commonest of output from          route, let's look at some of the other things we          can learn from route and also how we can change          the routing table.       

D.1.3. Using route to display the routing cache

          The routing cache is used by the kernel as a lookup table analogous          to a quick reference card.  It's faster for the kernel to refer to          the cache (internally implemented as a hash table) for a recently          used route than to lookup the destination address again.  Routes          existing in the route cache are periodically expired.  If you need          to clean out the routing cache entirely, you'll want to become          familiar with ip          route flush cache.       

          At first, it might surprise you to learn that there are no entries          for locally connected networks in a routing cache.  After a bit of          reflection, you come to realize that there is on need to cache an IP          route for a locally connected network because the machine is          connected to the same Ethernet.  So, any given destination has an          entry in either the arp table or in the routing cache.  For a          clearer picture of the differences between each of the cached          routse, I'd suggest adding a -e switch.       

Example D.3. Viewing the routing cache with route

[root@tristan]# route -Cen Kernel IP routing cache Source Destination Gateway Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 194.52.197.133 192.168.99.35 192.168.99.35 l 40 0 0 lo 192.168.99.35 194.52.197.133 192.168.99.254 1500 0 29 eth0 192.168.99.35 192.168.99.254 192.168.99.254 1500 0 0 eth0 192.168.99.254 192.168.99.35 192.168.99.35 il 40 0 0 lo 192.168.99.35 192.168.99.35 192.168.99.35 l 16436 0 0 lo 192.168.99.35 194.52.197.133 192.168.99.254 1500 0 0 eth0 192.168.99.35 192.168.99.254 192.168.99.254 1500 0 0 eth0

          FIXME!  I don't really know why there are three entries in the routing          cache for each destination.  Here, for example, we see three entries          in the routing cache for 194.52.197.133 (a Swedish destination).       

          The MSS column tells us what the path MTU discovery has determined          for a maximum segment size for the route to this destination.  By          discovering the proper segment size for a route and caching this          information, we can make most efficient use of bandwidth to the          destination, without incurring the overhead of packet fragmentation          enroute.  See Section 4.10.1, “MTU, MSS, and ICMP” for a more complete          discussion of MSS and MTU.       

          FIXME!  There has to be more we can say about the routing cache          here.       

D.1.4. Creating a static route with route add

          Static routes are explicit routes to non-local destinations through          routers or gateways which are not the default gateway.  The case of          the routing table on           tristan is a classic          example of the need for a static route.  There are two routers in          the same network,           masq-gw and          isdn-router.  If           tristan has packets for          the 192.168.98.0/24 network, they should be routed to 192.168.99.1          (isdn-router).  Refer          also to Section 1.3.3, “Adding and removing a static route” for this example.       

          As with ifconfig,          route has a syntax unlike most standard unix          command line utilities, mixing options and arguments with less          regularity.  Note the mandatory -net or          -host options when adding or removing any route          other than the default route.       

          In order to add a static route to the routing table, you'll need to          gather several pieces of information about the remote network.       

          In our example network,           masq-gw can only reach          10.38.0.0/16 through           service-router.  Let's          add a static route to the masquerading firewall to ensure that          10.38.0.0/16 is reachable.  Our intended routing table will look          like the routing table in          Example D.2, “Viewing a complex routing table with route”.          Let's also view the output          if we mistype the IP address of the default gateway and specify an          address which is not a locally reachable address.       

Example D.4. Adding a static route to a network route add

[root@masq-gw]# route add -net 10.38.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 gw 192.168.109.1 SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable [root@masq-gw]# route add -net 10.38.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 gw 192.168.100.1

          It should be clear now that the gateway address must be reachable on          a locally connected network for a static route to be useable (or          even make sense).  In the first line, where we mistyped, the route          could not be added to the routing table because the gateway address          was not a reachable address.       

          Now, instead of sending packets with a destination of 10.38.0.0/16          to the default gateway,           wan-gw,          masq-gw will send this          traffic to           service-router at IP          address 192.168.100.1.       

          The above is a simple example of routing a network to a separate          gateway, a gateway other than the default gateway.  This is a common          need on networks central to an operation, and less common in branch          offices and remote networks.       

          Occasionally, however, you'll have a single machine with an IP          address in a different range on the same Ethernet as some other          machines.  Or you might have a single machine which is reachable          via a router.  Let's look at these two scenarios to see how we can          create static routes to solve this routing need.       

          Occasionally, you may have a desire to restrict communication from          one network to another by not including routes to the network.          In our sample network, tristan may be a          workstation of an employee who doesn't need to reach any machines in          the branch office.  Perhaps this employee needs to periodically          access some data or service supplied on 192.168.98.101.  We'll need          to add a static route to allow this machine to access this single          host IP in the branch office network          [47].       

          Here's a summary of the required          data for our static route.  The destination is          192.168.98.101/32 and the gateway is 192.168.99.1.       

Example D.5. Adding a static route to a host with route add

[root@tristan]# route add -host 192.168.98.101 gw 192.168.99.1 [root@tristan]# route -nKernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.98.101 192.168.99.1 255.255.255.255 UG 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.99.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

          Now, we have successfully altered the routing table to include a          host route for the single machine we want our employee to be able to          reach.       

          Even rarer, you may encounter a situation where a single Ethernet          network is used to host multiple IP networks.  There are reasons          people might do this, although I regard this is bad form.  If          possible, it is cleaner, more secure, and easier to troubleshoot if          you do not share IP networks on the same media segment.  With that          said, you can still convince your linux box to be a part of each          network          [48].       

          Let's assume for the sake of this example that NAT is not an option          for us, and we need to move the machine 205.254.211.184 into another          network.  Though it violates the concept of security partitioning,          we have decided to put the server into the same network as          service-router.          Naturally, we'll need to modify the routing table on           masq-gw.       

          Be sure to refer to Section 9.3, “Breaking a network in two with proxy ARP” for a          complete discussion of this unusual networking scenario.       

Example D.6. Adding a static route to a host on the same media with route add

[root@masq-gw]# route add -host 205.254.211.184 dev eth3

          I'll leave as an exercise to the reader's imagination the question          of how to send all traffic to a locally connected network to an          interface.  In light of the host route above, it should be a logical          step for the reader to make.       

          The above are common examples of the usage of the          route command.       

       

D.1.5. Creating a default route with route add default

          The default route is a special case of a static route.  Any machine          which is connected to the Internet has a default route.  For the          majority of smaller networks which are not running dynamic routing          protocols, each machine on an internal network uses a router or          firewall as its default gateway, forwarding all traffic to that          destination.  Typically, this router or firewall forwards the          traffic to the next router or device via a static route until the          traffic reaches the ISP's service access router.  Many ISPs use          dynamic routing internally to determine the best path out of their          networks to remote destinations.       

          But we are only interested in adding a default route and          understanding that packets are reaching the default gateway.  Once          the packets have reached the default gateway, we assume that the          administrator of that device is monitoring its correct operation.       

          With this bit of background about the default route, it is easy to          see why a default route is a key part of any networking device's          configuration.  If the machine is to reach machines other than the          machines on the local network, it must know the address of the          default gateway.       

          Because the default gateway is so important, there is particular          support for adding a default route included in the         route command.  Refer to          Example 1.8, “Adding a default route with route” for a simple          example of adding a          default route.  The syntax of the command is as follows:       

Example D.7. Setting the default route with route

[root@tristan]# route add default gw 192.168.99.254

          This is the commonest method used for setting a default route,          although the route can also be specified by the following command.          I find the alternate method more explicit than the common method for          setting default gateway, because the destination address and network          mask are treated exactly like any other network address and netmask.       

Example D.8. An alternate method of setting the default route with route

[root@tristan]# route add -net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 gw 192.168.99.254

          The alternate method of setting a default route specifies a network          and netmask of 0, which is shorthand for all destinations.  I'll          reiterate that the kernel sees these two methods of setting the          default route as identical.  The resulting routing table is exactly          the same.  You may select whichever of these          route invocations you find more comfortable.       

          Now that we have covered adding static routes and the special static          route, the default route, let's try our hand at removing existing          routes from routing tables.       

D.1.6. Removing routes with route del

          Any route can be removed from the routing table as easily as it can          be added.  The syntax of the command is exactly the same as the          syntax of the route add command.       

          After we went to all of the trouble above to put our machine          205.254.211.184 into the network with          service-router, we          probably realize that from a security partitioning standpoint, it is          not only stupid, but also foolhardy!  So now, we conclude that we          need to return 205.254.211.184 to its former network (the DMZ          proper).  We'll now remove the special host route for its IP, so the          network route for 205.254.211.0/24 will now be used for reaching          this host.  (If you have questions about why, read          Section 4.5, “Route Selection”.)       

Example D.9. Removing a static host route with route del

[root@masq-gw]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 205.254.211.184 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 U 0 0 0 eth3 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0 0 eth3 205.254.211.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2 192.168.98.0 192.168.99.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2 10.38.0.0 192.168.100.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth3 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 205.254.211.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 [root@masq-gw]# route del -host 205.254.211.184 dev eth3

          Another possible example might be the prohibition of Internet          traffic to a particular user.  If a machine does not have a default          route, but instead has a routing table populated only with routes to          internal networks, then that machine can only reach IP addresses in          networks to which it has a routing table entry.  Let's say that you          have a user who routinely spends work hours browsing the Internet,          fetching mail from a POP account outside your network, and in short          wastes time on the Internet.  You can easily prevent this user from          reaching anything except your internal networks.  Naturally, this          sort of a problem employee should probably face some sort of          administrative sanction to address the real problem, but as a          technical component of the strategy to prevent this user from          wasting time on the Internet, you could remove access to the          Internet from this employee's machine.       

          In the below example, we'll use the route command          a number of times for different operations, all of which you should          be familiar with by now.       

Example D.10. Removing the default route with route del

[root@morgan]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.98.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.98.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 [root@morgan]# route del default gw 192.168.98.254[root@morgan]# route add -net 192.168.99.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.98.254[root@morgan]# route add -net 192.168.100.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.98.254[root@morgan]# route add -net 205.254.211.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.98.254[root@morgan]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 205.254.211.0 192.168.98.254 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.100.0 192.168.98.254 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.99.0 192.168.98.254 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.98.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo

          Now, the user on morgan          can only reach the specified networks.  The networks we have entered          here are all of our corporate networks.  If the user tries to          generate a packet to any other destination, the kernel is not going          to know where to send it, so will return in error code to the          application trying to make the network connection.       

          While this can be a very effective way to restrict access to an          individual machine, it is an ineffective method of systems          administration, since it requires that the user log in to the          affected machine and make changes to the routing table on demand.  A          better solution would be to use packet          filter rules.       



[47              Though tristan does not              have a direct route to the 192.168.98.0/24 network, it does have              a default route which knows about this destination network.              Therefore, for the purposes of this illustrative example, we'll              assume thatmasq-gw is              configured to drop or reject all traffic to 192.168.98.0/24 from              192.168.99.0/24 and vice versa.  Effectively this means that the              only path to reach the branch office from the main office is via               isdn-router.           

[48              There can potentially be routing problems with multiple IP              networks on the same media segment, but if you can remember that              IP routing is essentially stateless, you can plan around these              routing problems and solve these problems.  For a fuller              discussion of these issues, see Section 9.4, “Multiple IPs on an Interface”              and Section 9.2, “Multiple IP Networks on one Ethernet Segment”.           

 
 
 
 

 

D.2. ip route

        Another part of the iproute2 suite of tools for IP        management,ip route provides management tools for        manipulating any of the routing tables.  Operations        include       displaying routes or the        routing cache,        adding routes,        deleting routes,       modifying existing routes, and        fetching a route and        clearing an entire routing table or        the routing cache.     

        One thing to keep in mind when using the ip route        is that you can operate on any of the 255 routing tables with this        command.  Where theroute        command operated only on the main routing table (table 254), the       ip route command operates by default on the main        routing table, but can be easily coaxed into using other tables with        thetable parameter.     

        Fortunately, as mentioned earlier, the iproute2        suite of tools does not rely on DNS for any operation so, the        ubiquitous-nswitch in previous examples will not be        required in any example here.     

        All operations with the ip route command are        atomic, so each command will return eitherRTNETLINK        answers: No such process in the case of an error, or        nothing in the face of success.  The-s switch which        provides additional statistical information when reporting link layer        information will only provide additional information when reporting on        the state of therouting        cache or fetching a specific        route..     

        The ip route utility when used in conjunction with        theip rule        utility can create stateless NAT tables.  It can even manipulate the        local routing table, a routing table used for traffic bound for        broadcast addresses and IP addresses hosted on the machine itself.     

        In order to understand the context in which this tool runs, you need        to understand some of the basics of IP routing, so if you have read        the above introduction to theip route tool, and        are confused, you may want to readChapter 4, IP Routing and         grasp some of the concepts of IP routing (with linux) before        continuing here.      

D.2.1. Displaying a routing table withip route          show

          In its simplest form, ip route can be used to          display the main routing table output.  The output of this command          is significantly different from the output of theroute.  For          comparison, let's look at the output of bothroute          -n and ip route show.       

Example D.11. Viewing the main routing table with ip route            show

[root@tristan]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.99.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 [root@tristan]# ip route show 192.168.99.0/24 dev eth0 scope link 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link default via 192.168.99.254 dev eth0

          If you are accustomed to the route output format,          theip route output can seem terse. The same basic information is displayed, however. As with our former example, let's ignore the 127.0.0.0/8 loopback route for the moment. This is a required route for any IPs hosted on the loopback interface. We are far more interested in the other two routes.

          The network 192.168.99.0/24 is available on eth0 with a scope of          link, which means that the network is valid and reachable through          this device (eth0).  Refer toTable C.2, “IP Scope under ip address”          for definitions of possible scopes.  As long as link remains good on          that device, we should be able to reach any IP address inside of          192.168.99.0/24 through the eth0 interface.       

          Finally, our all-important default route is expressed in the routing          table with the word default.  Note that any destination which is          reachable through a gateway appears in the routing table output with          the keywordvia.  This final line matches          semantically with the final line of output fromroute          -n above.       

          Now, let's have a look at the local routing table, which we can't          see withroute.  To be fair, it is usually          completely unnecessary to view and/or manipulate the local routing          table, which is whyroute provides no way to          access this information.       

Example D.12. Viewing the local routing table with ip route show            table local

[root@tristan]# ip route show table local local 192.168.99.35 dev eth0 proto kernel scope host src 192.168.99.35 broadcast 127.255.255.255 dev lo proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1 broadcast 192.168.99.255 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.99.35 broadcast 127.0.0.0 dev lo proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1 local 127.0.0.1 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1 local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1

          This gives us a good deal of information about the IP networks to          which the machine is directly connected, and an inside look into the           way that the routing tables treat special addresses like broadcast          addresses and locally configured addresses.       

          The first field in this output tells us whether the route is for a          broadcast address or an IP address or range locally hosted on this          machine.  Subsequent fields inform us through which device the          destination is reachable, and notably (in this table) that the          kernel has added these routes as part of bringing up the IP layer          interfaces.       

          For each IP hosted on the machine, it makes sense that the machine          should restrict accessiblity to that IP or IP range to itself only.          This explains why, inExample D.12, “Viewing the local routing table with ip route show            table local”,          192.168.99.35 has a host scope.  Becausetristan hosts this IP, there's no          reason for the packet to be routed off the box.  Similarly, a          destination of localhost (127.0.0.1) does not need to be forwarded          off this machine.  In each of these cases, the scope has been set to          host.       

          For broadcast addresses, which are intended for any listeners who          happen to share the IP network, the destination only makes sense as          for a scope of devices connected to the same link layer         [49].       

          The final characteristic available to us in each line of the local          routing table output is thesrc keyword.  This is          treated as a hint to the kernel about what IP address to select for          a source address on outgoing packets on this interface.  Naturally,          this is most commonly used (and abused) on multi-homed hosts,          although almost every machine out there uses this hint for          connections to localhost         [50].       

          Now that we have inspected the main routing table and the local          routing table, let's see how easy it is to look at any one of the          other routing tables.  This is as simple as specifying the table by          its name in/etc/iproute2/rt_tables or by          number.  There are a few reserved table identifiers in this file,          but the other table numbers between 1 and 252 are available for the          user.  Please note that this example is for demonstration only and          has no intrinsic value other than showing the use of the         table parameter.       

Example D.13. Viewing a routing table with ip route            show table

[root@tristan]# ip route show table special Error: argument "special" is wrong: table id value is invalid [root@tristan]# echo 7 special >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables [root@tristan]# ip route show table special [root@tristan]# ip route add table special default via 192.168.99.254[root@tristan]# ip route show table special default via 192.168.99.254 dev eth0

          In the above example you get a first glance at how to add a route to          a table other than the main routing table, but what we are really          interested in is the final command and output.  In         Example D.13, “Viewing a routing table with ip route            show table”, we have identified table 7          by the name "special" and have added a route to this table.  The          commandip route show table special shows us          routing table number 7 from the kernel.       

          ip route consults         /etc/iproute2/rt_tables for a table identifier.          If it finds no identifier, it complains that it cannot find a          reference to such a table.  If a table identifier is found, then the          corresponding routing table is displayed.       

          The use of multiple routing tables can make a router very complex,          very quickly.  Using names instead of numbers for these tables can          assist in the management of this complexity.  For further discussion          on managing multiple routing tables and some issues of handling          them see Section 10.3, “Using the Routing Policy Database and Multiple Routing      Tables”.       

D.2.2. Displaying the routing cache withip route          show cache

          The routing cache is used by the kernel as a lookup table analogous          to a quick reference card.  It's faster for the kernel to refer to          the cache (internally implemented as a hash table) for a recently          used route than to lookup the destination address again.  Routes          existing in the route cache are periodically expired.       

          The routing cache can be displayed in all its glory with ip          route show cache, which provides a detailed view of recent          destination IP addresses and salient characteristics about those          destinations.  On routers, masquerading boxen and firewalls, the          routing cache can become very large.  Instead of viewing the entire          routing cache even on a workstation, we'll select a particular          destination from the routing cache to examine.       

Example D.14. Displaying the routing cache with ip route            show cache

[root@tristan]# ip route show cache 192.168.100.17 192.168.100.17 from 192.168.99.35 via 192.168.99.254 dev eth0 cache mtu 1500 rtt 18ms rttvar 15ms cwnd 15 advmss 1460 192.168.100.17 via 192.168.99.254 dev eth0 src 192.168.99.35 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460

          FIXME!  I don't know how to explain rtt, rttvar, and cwnd, even          after reading Alexey's comments in the iproute2 documentation!          Not only that, I'm not sure why there are two entries!       

          The output in Example D.14, “Displaying the routing cache with ip route            show cache”          summarizes the reachability of the destination 192.168.100.17 from          192.168.99.35.  The first line of each entry provides some important          information for us:  the destination IP, the source IP, the gateway          through which the destination is reachable, and the interface          through which packets were routed.  Together, these data          identify a route entry in the cache.       

          Characteristics of that route          are summarized in the second line of each entry.  For the route          betweentristanand          isolde, we see that Path          MTU discovery has identified 1500 bytes as the maximum packet size          from end to end.  The maximum segment size (MSS) of data is 1460          bytes.  Although this is not usually of any but the most casual of          interest, it can be helpful diagnostic information.       

          If you are a die-hard fan of statistics, and can't get enough          information about the routing on your machine, you can always          throw the-s switch.       

Example D.15. Displaying statistics from the routing cache with           ip -s route show cache

[root@tristan]# ip -s route show cache 192.168.100.17 192.168.100.17 from 192.168.99.35 via 192.168.99.254 dev eth0 cache users 1 used 326 age 12sec mtu 1500 rtt 72ms rttvar 22ms cwnd 2 advmss 1460 192.168.100.17 via 192.168.99.254 dev eth0 src 192.168.99.35 cache users 1 used 326 age 12sec mtu 1500 advmss 1460

          With this output, you'll get just a bit more information about the          routes.  The most interesting datum is usually the "used" field,          which indicates the number of times this route has been accessed in          the routing cache.  This can give you a very good idea of how many          times a particular route has been used.  The age field is used by          the kernel to decide when to expire a cache entry.  The age is reset          every time the route is accessed         [51].       

          In sum, you can use the routing cache to learn a good deal about          remote IP destinations and some of the characteristics of the          network path to those destinations.       

D.2.3. Using ip route add to populate a routing          table

          ip route add is a used to populate a          routing table.  Although you can useroute add to do          the same thing,ip route add offers a large          number of options that are not possible with the venerable         route command.          After we have looked at some simple examples, we'll discuss more          complex routes withip route.       

          In Section D.1, “route, we used two classic examples of          adding a network route (to our service provider's network from )          and a host route.  Let's look at the          difference in syntax with the ip route command.       

Example D.16. Adding a static route to a network with route            add, cf. Example D.4, “Adding a static route to a networkroute add”

[root@masq-gw]# ip route add 10.38.0.0/16 via 192.168.100.1

          This is one of the simplest examples of the syntax of the          ip route.  As you may recall, you can only add a          route to a destination network through a gateway that is itself          already reachable.  In this case,         masq-gw already knows a          route to 192.168.100.1          (service-router).  Now          any packets bound for 10.38.0.0/16 will be forwarded to          192.168.100.1.       

          Other interesting examples of this command involve the use of         prohibit and from.  Use of the         prohibit will cause the router to report that the          requested destination is unreachable.  If you know a netblock that          hosts a service you are not interested in allowing your users to          access, this is an effective way to block the outbound connection          attempts.       

          Let's look at an example of tcpdump output          which shows theprohibit route in action.       

Example D.17. Adding a prohibit route withroute            add

[root@masq-gw]# ip route add prohibit 209.10.26.51 [root@tristan]# ssh 209.10.26.51 ssh: connect to address 209.10.26.51 port 22: No route to host [root@masq-gw]# tcpdump -nnq -i eth2tcpdump: listening on eth2 22:13:13.740406 192.168.99.35.51973 > 209.10.26.51.22: tcp 0 (DF) 22:13:13.740714 192.168.99.254 > 192.168.99.35: icmp: host 209.10.26.51 unreachable - admin prohibited filter [tos 0xc0]

          Compare the ICMP packet returned to the sender in this case with the         ICMP packet returned if          you used iptables and theREJECT          target          [52].          Although the net effect is identical (the user is unable          to reach the intended destinatioan), the user gets two different          error messages.  With an iptables          REJECT, the user seesConnection          refused, where the user seesNo          route to host with the use of         prohibit.  These are but two of the options for          controlling outbound access from your network.       

          Supposing you don't want to block access to this particular host for          all of your users, thefrom option comes to your          aid.       

Example D.18. Using from in a routing command with           route add

[root@masq-gw]# ip route add prohibit 209.10.26.51 from 192.168.99.35

          Now, you have effectively blocked the source IP 192.168.99.35 from          reaching 209.10.26.51.  Any packets matching this source and          destination address will match this route.  In this case,         masq-gw will generate an          ICMP error message indicating that the destination is          administratively unreachable.       

          If you are still following along here, you can see that the options          for identifying particular routes are many and multi-faceted.  The         src option provides a hint to the kernel for source          address selection.  When you are working with multiple routing          tables and different classes of traffic, you can ease your          administrative burden, by hosting several          different IPs on your linux machine and setting the source address          differently, depending on the type of traffic.       

          In the example below, let's assume that our masquerading host also          runs a DNS resolver for the internal network and we have selected          all of the outbound DNS packets to be routed according to table 7         [53].          Now, any packet which originates on this box (or is masqueraded          through this table) will have its source IP set to 205.254.211.198.       

Example D.19. Using src in a routing command with           route add

[root@masq-gw]# ip route add default via 205.254.211.254 src 205.254.211.198 table 7

          FIXME!!  I have nothing to say about nexthop yet,          because I have never used it, this goes for         equalize and onlinkas well.  If          anybody has some examples s/he would like to contribute, I'd love to          hear.       

          There are other options to the ip route add          documented in Alexey's thoroughiproute2          documentation.  For further research, I'd suggested acquiring and          reading this manual.       

D.2.4. Adding a default route withip route add          default

          Naturally, one of the most important routes on a machine is its          default route.  Adding a default route is one of the simplest          operations withip route.       

          We need exactly one piece of information in order to set the default          route on a machine.  This is the IP address of the gateway.  The          syntax of the command is extremely simple and aside from the use of          thevia instead of gw, it is          almost the same command as the equivalentroute          -n.       

Example D.20. Setting the default route with ip route add default

[root@tristan]# ip route add default via 192.168.99.254

D.2.5. Setting up NAT with ip route add nat

          Be sure to see Chapter 5, Network Address Translation (NAT) for a full treatment of the          issues involved in network address translation (NAT).  If you are          here to learn a bit more about how to set up NAT in your network,          then you should know that theip route add nat is          only half of the solution.  You must understand that performing NAT          withiproute2 involves one component to rewrite          the inbound packet (ip route add nat), and          another command to rewrite the outbound packet (ip rule add          nat).  If you only get half of the system in place,          your NAT will only work halfway--or not at all, depending on how you          define "work".       

          Alexey documents clearly in the appendix to the          iproute2 manual that the NAT provided by the         iproute2 suite is stateless.  This is distinctly          unlike NAT with netfilter.  Refer toSection 5.5, “Destination NAT with netfilter (DNAT)” and         Section 8.3, “Netfilter Connection Tracking”          for a better look at the connection tracking and network address          translation support available under netfilter.       

          The ip route add nat command is used to rewrite          the destination address of a packet from one IP or range to another          IP or range.  Theiproute2 tools can only operate          on the entire IP packet.  There is no provision directly within the         iproute2suite to support conditional rewriting          based on the destination port of a UDP datagram or TCP segment.          It's the whole packet, every packet, and nothing but the packet         [54].       

Example D.21. Creating a NAT route for a single IP with ip route add            nat

[root@masq-gw]# ip route add nat 205.254.211.17 via 192.168.100.17 [root@masq-gw]# ip route show table local | grep ^nat nat 205.254.211.17 via 192.168.100.17 scope host

          The route entry we have just made tells the kernel to rewrite any          inbound packet bound for 205.254.211.17 to 192.168.100.17.  The          actual rewriting of the packet occurs at the routing stage of the          packets trip through the kernel.  This is an important detail,          illuminated more fully in         Section 5.4, “Stateless NAT and Packet Filtering”.       

          Not only can iproute2 support network address          translation for single IPs, but also for entire network ranges.  The          syntax is substantially similar to the syntax above, but uses a          CIDR network address instead of a single IP.       

Example D.22. Creating a NAT route for an entire network withip            route add nat

[root@masq-gw]# ip route add nat 205.254.211.32/29 via 192.168.100.32 [root@masq-gw]# ip route show table local | grep ^nat nat 205.254.211.32/29 via 192.168.100.32 scope host

          In this example, we are adding a route for an entire network.  Any          IP packets which come to us destined for any address between          205.254.211.32 and 205.254.211.39 will be rewritten to the          corresponding address in the range 192.168.100.32 through          192.168.100.39.  This is a shorthand way to specify multiple          translations with CIDR notation.       

          Again, this is only one half of the story for NAT with          iproute2.  Please be certain to read           the section below for usage information onip rule add          nat, in addition toChapter 5, Network Address Translation (NAT) which          will provide fuller documentation for NAT support under linux.          Don't forget to useip route flush          cache after you add NAT routes and          the corresponding NAT rules         [55].       

D.2.6. Removing routes with ip route del

          The ip route del takes exactly the same syntax as          theip route          add command, so if you have familiarized yourself          with the syntax, this should be a snap.       

          It is, in fact, almost trivial to delete routes on the command line          withip route del.  You can simply identify the          route you wish to remove withip route show          command and append the output line verbatim toip route          del.       

Example D.23. Removing routes with ip route del         [56]         

[root@masq-gw]# ip route show 192.168.100.0/30 dev eth3 scope link 205.254.211.0/24 dev eth1 scope link 192.168.100.0/24 dev eth0 scope link 192.168.99.0/24 dev eth0 scope link 192.168.98.0/24 via 192.168.99.1 dev eth0 10.38.0.0/16 via 192.168.100.1 dev eth3 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link default via 205.254.211.254 dev eth1 [root@masq-gw]# ip route del 10.38.0.0/16 via 192.168.100.1 dev eth3

          We identified the network route to 10.38.0.0/16 as the route we          wished to remove, and simply appended the description of the route          to ourip route del command.       

          This command can be used to remove routes such as broadcast routes          and routes to locally hosted IPs in addition to manipulation of          any of the other routing tables.  This means that you can cause some          very strange problems on your machine by inadvertently removing          routes, especially routes to locally hosted IP addresses.       

D.2.7. Altering existing routes withip route          change

          Occasionally, you'll want to remove a route and replace it with          another one.  Fortunately, this can be done atomically with         ip route change.       

          Let's change the default route on tristan with this command.       

Example D.24. Altering existing routes with ip route            change

[root@tristan]# ip route change default via 192.168.99.113 dev eth0 [root@tristan]# ip route show 192.168.99.0/24 dev eth0 scope link 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link default via 192.168.99.113 dev eth0

          If you do use the ip route change command, you          should be aware that it does not communicate a routing table state          change to the routing cache, so here is another good place to get in          the habit of using ip route flush          cache.       

          There's not much more to say about the use of this command.  If you          don't want to use anip route del          immediately followed by anip route add          you can useip route change.       

D.2.8. Programmatically fetching route information withip          route get

          When configuring routing tables, it is not always sufficient to          search for the destination manually.  Especially with large routing          tables, this can become a rather boring and time-consuming endeavor.          Fortunately,ip route get elegantly solves the          problem.  By simulating a request for the specified destination,         ip route get causes the routing selection          algorithm to be run.  When this is complete, it prints out the          resulting path to the destination.  In one sense, this is almost          equivalent to sending an ICMP echo request packet and then using          ip route show          cache.       

Example D.25. Testing routing tables with ip route            get

[root@tristan]# ip -s route get 127.0.0.1/32 ip -s route get 127.0.0.1/32 local 127.0.0.1 dev lo src 127.0.0.1 cache <local> users 1 used 1 mtu 16436 advmss 16396 [root@tristan]# ip -s route get 127.0.0.1/32 local 127.0.0.1 dev lo src 127.0.0.1 cache <local> users 1 used 2 mtu 16436 advmss 16396

          For casual use, ip route get is an invaluable          tool.  An obvious side effect of usingip route          get the increase in the usage count of every touched entry          in the routing cache.  While this is no problem, it will alter the          count of packets which have used that particular route.  If you are          using ip to count outbound packets (people have          done it!) you should be cautious with this command.       

D.2.9. Clearing routing tables withip route          flush

          The flush option, when used with ip          route empties a routing table or removes the route for a          particular destination.  InExample D.26, “Removing a specific route and emptying a routing table with           ip route flush”,          we'll first remove a route for a destination network using         ip route flush, and then we'll remove all of the          routes in the main routing table with one command.       

          If you do not wish to delete routes by hand, you can quickly          empty all of the routes in a table by specifying a table identifier          to theip route flush command.       

Example D.26. Removing a specific route and emptying a routing table with           ip route flush

[root@masq-gw]# ip route flush "ip route flush" requires arguments [root@masq-gw]# ip route flush 10.38 Nothing to flush. [root@masq-gw]# ip route flush 10.38.0.0/16 [root@masq-gw]# ip route show 192.168.100.0/30 dev eth3 scope link 205.254.211.0/24 dev eth1 scope link 192.168.100.0/24 dev eth0 scope link 192.168.99.0/24 dev eth0 scope link 192.168.98.0/24 via 192.168.99.1 dev eth0 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link default via 205.254.211.254 dev eth1[root@masq-gw]# ip route flush table main [root@masq-gw]# ip route show [root@masq-gw]#

          Note that you should exercise caution when using ip route          flush table because you can easily destroy your own route          to the machine by specifying the main routing table or a routing          table that is used to send packets to your workstation.  Naturally,          this is not a problem if you are connected to the machine via a          serial, modem, console, or other out of band connection.       

D.2.10. ip route flush cache

          Above, in Section D.2.2, “Displaying the routing cache with ip route          show cache, we looked at          the contents of the routing cache, a hash table in the kernel which          contains recently used routes.  To quote John S. Denker, you          should not forget to use ip route flush cache          after you have changed the routing tables; "otherwise changes will          take effect only after some maddeningly irreproducible delay."          [57]       

          Since the kernel refers to the routing cache before fetching a new          route from the routing tables,ip route flush          cacheempties the cache of any data.  Now when the kernel          goes to the routing cache to locate the best route to a destination,          it finds the cache empty.  Next, it traverses the routing policy          database and routing tables.  When the kernel finds the route, it          will enter the newly fetched destination into the routing cache.       

Example D.27. Emptying the routing cache with ip route flush            cache

[root@tristan]# ip route show cache local 127.0.0.1 from 127.0.0.1 tos 0x10 dev lo cache <local> mtu 16436 advmss 16396 local 127.0.0.1 from 127.0.0.1 dev lo cache <local> mtu 16436 advmss 16396 192.168.100.17 from 192.168.99.35 via 192.168.99.254 dev eth0 cache mtu 1500 rtt 18ms rttvar 15ms cwnd 15 advmss 1460 192.168.100.17 via 192.168.99.254 dev eth0 src 192.168.99.35 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 [root@tristan]# ip route flush cache [root@tristan]# ip route show cache[root@tristan]# ip route show cache local 127.0.0.1 from 127.0.0.1 tos 0x10 dev lo cache <local> mtu 16436 advmss 16396 local 127.0.0.1 from 127.0.0.1 dev lo cache <local> mtu 16436 advmss 16396

          When making routing changes to a linux box, you can save yourself          some troubleshooting time (and confusion) by getting in the habit of          finishing your routing commands withip route flush          cache.       

D.2.11. Summary of the use ofip route

          With this overview of the use of the ip route          utility, you should be ready to step into some advanced territory to          harness multiple routing tables, take advantage of special types of          routes, use network address translation, and gather detailed          statistics on the usage of your routing tables.       



[49]              I'm going to specifically neglect a discussion of bridging and              broadcast addresses for now.  Let's assume a simple Ethernet              where the entire IP network is on one hub or switch.           

[50]              When a user initiates a connection to localhost (let's say              localhost:25, where a private SMTP server is listening), the              connection could, of course, come from the IP assigned to any of              the Ethernet interfaces. It makes the most sense, however, for the              source IP to be set to 127.0.0.1, since the connection is              actually initiated from on the local machine.  Some services              running on a local machine rely on the loopback interface and              will restrict incoming connections to source addresses of              127.0.0.1.  Frankly, I find this quite sensible for services              which are not intended for public use.           

[51]              Be wary of using              ip route              get and ip route show cache              because ip route get              implicitly causes a route lookup to be performed, thus              increasing the used counter on the route, and resetting the age.              This will alter the statistics reported byip -s route              show cache.           

[52]              Please note that I in the cross-referenced example I have used             iptables.  The same behaviour should be              expected withipchains. (Anybody have any              proof?)           

[53]              If you wonder how this kind of magic is accomplished, you'll              want to readSection 10.3.2, “Using fwmark for Policy Routing”.           

[54]              This should not lead you into believing it cannot be done.  This              is linux after all!  By routing via fwmark, and using the             --mark option to ipchains or              the MARK target and--set-mark option in              iptables, you can perform conditional routing              based on characteristics and contents of the packet.           

[55]              You can always use my              SysV initialization script              and              configuration file              instead of entering your own commands, however, it is              always important to understand the tool you are using.           

[56]              Please note that this is the same routing table as is shown in              theExample D.2, “Viewing a complex routing table withroute”, which              displays the output fromroute -n on              masq-gw.           

[57]              See this remark in his              documentation              of a workaround with FreeS/WAN and iproute2 to approximate more              RFC-like SPD behaviour for a linux IPSec tunnel.           

 

 

 

 

D.3. ip rule

        Another part of the iproute2 software package,        ip rule is the single tool for manipulating the        routing policy database under linux (RPDB).  For a fuller discussion        of the RPDB, see Section 10.3, “Using the Routing Policy Database and Multiple Routing      Tables”.  The RPDB can be displayed with ip rule        show.  Particular rules can be added and removed with        (predictably, if you have been reading the sections on the other        iproute2 tools) ip rule add        command and the ip rule del        command.  We'll make a particular example of the ip rule add        nat.     

D.3.1. ip rule show

          Briefly, the RPDB mediates access to the routing tables.  In the          overwhelming majority of installations (most workstations, servers,          and even routers),          there is no need to take advantage of the RPDB.  A single IP routing          table is all that is required for basic connectivity.  In more complex          networking configurations, however, the RPDB allows the administrator          to programmatically select a routing table based on characteristics of          a packet.       

          Along with this freedom and flexibility comes the power to break          networking in strange and unexpected ways.  I will reiterate:          IP routing is stateless.  Because IP routing is          stateless, the network architect, planner or administrator needs to be          aware of the issues involved with using multiple routing tables.       

          For a fuller discussion of some of these issues, be sure to read          Section 10.3, “Using the Routing Policy Database and Multiple Routing      Tables”.  Now, let's look at some of the ways to use          ip rule.       

D.3.2. Displaying the RPDB with ip rule show

          To display the RPDB, use the command ip route show.          The output of the command is a list of rules in the RPDB sorted by          order of priority.  The rules with the highest priority will be          displayed at the top of the output.       

Example D.28. Displaying the RPDB with ip rule            show

[root@isolde]# ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup 253

          There are some interesting items to observe here.  First, these are          the three default rules in the RPDB which will be available on any          machine with an RPDB.  The first rule specifies that any packet from          any where should first be matched against routes in the local          routing table.  Remember that the local routing table is for          broadcast addresses on link layers, network address translation, and          locally hosted IP addresses.       

          If a packet is not bound for any of these three destinations, the          kernel will check the next entry in the RPDB.  In the simple case          above, on isolde, a          packet bound for 205.254.211.182 would first pass through the local          routing table without matching any of the local destinations.  The          next entry in the RPDB recommends using the main routing table to          select a destination route.       

          In isolde's main routing          table, it is likely that there is no host nor network match for this          destination, thus the packet will match the default route in the          main routing table.       

          FIXME!!  Can anybody (somebody?) explain to me why there is a rule          priority 32767 which refers to table 253?  I'm still confused about          this.       

D.3.3. Adding a rule to the RPDB with ip rule          add

          Adding a rule to the routing policy database is simple.  The syntax          of the ip rule add command should be familiar to          those who have read Section D.2, “ip route or have used the          ip route to populate routing tables.       

          A simple rule selects a packet on the the packet's characteristics.          Some characteristics available as selection criteria  are the          source address, the destination, the type of service (ToS), the          interface on which the packet arrived, and an fwmark.       

          One great way to take advantage of the RPDB is to split different          types of traffic to different providers based on packet          characteristics.  Let's assume two network connections on          masq-gw, one that is a          highly reliable high cost connection, and a much lower cost less          reliable connection.  Let's also assume that we are using Type of          Service flags on IP packets on the internal network.       

          We might want to prefer a low-latency, highly reliable link          for one type of packet.  By using tos as a          selection criterion with ip rule we can          effectively route these packets via our faster and more reliable          internet connection.       

Example D.29. Creating a simple entry in the RPDB with ip rule            add            [58]         

[root@masq-gw]# ip route add default via 205.254.211.254 table 8 [root@masq-gw]# ip rule add tos 0x08 table 8 [root@masq-gw]# ip route flush cache [root@masq-gw]# ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from all tos 0x08 lookup 8 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup 253

          Note that the rule we inserted was added to the next available          higher priority in the RPDB because we did not specify a priority.          If we wished to specify a priority, we could use          prio.       

          Now any packet with an IP ToS field matching 0x08 will be routed          according to the instructions in table 8.  If no route in table 8          applies to the matched packet (not possible, since we added a          default route), the packet would be routed according to the          instructions in table "main".       

          The selection criteria for matching a packet can be grouped.  Let's          look at a more complex example of ip rule where          we use multiple selection criteria.       

Example D.30. Creating a complex entry in the RPDB with ip rule            add

[root@masq-gw]# ip rule add from 192.168.100.17 tos 0x08 fwmark 4 table 7

          Frankly, that's a very complex rule!  I do not know if I could          describe a scenario where this particular rule would be required.          The point, though, is that you can have arbitrarily complex          selection criteria, and multiple rules which lookup routes in as          many of the 253 routing tables as you wish.       

          ip rule add, while a powerful tool, can quickly          make a routing table or router too complex to easily understand.          It's important to try to design and implement the simplest          configuration to maintain on your router.  If you cannot avoid using          multiple routing tables and the RPDB, at least be systematic about          it.       

D.3.4. ip rule add nat

          As discussed more thoroughly in Chapter 5, Network Address Translation (NAT), this is the          other half of iproute2supported network address          translation.  The two components are ip route add          nat and ip rule add nat.       

          ip rule add nat is used to rewrite the source IP          on packets during the routing stage.  Each packet from the real IP          is translated to the NAT IP without altering the destination address          of the packet.       

          NAT is commonly used to publish a service in an internal network on          a public IP.  Thus packets returning to the public network need to          be readdressed to appear with a source address of the publicly          accessibly IP.       

Example D.31. Creating a NAT rule with ip rule add            nat

[root@masq-gw]# ip rule add nat 205.254.211.17 from 192.168.100.17 [root@masq-gw]# ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from 192.168.100.17 lookup main map-to 205.254.211.17 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup 253

          In more complex situations, entire subnets can be translated to          provide NAT for a range of IPs.  The example below shows how to          specify the ip rule add nat to complete the NAT          mapping in Example D.22, “Creating a NAT route for an entire network with ip            route add nat”.       

Example D.32. Creating a NAT rule for an entire network with ip            rule add nat

[root@masq-gw]# ip rule add nat 205.254.211.32 from 192.168.100.32/29 [root@masq-gw]# ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from 192.168.100.32/29 lookup main map-to 205.254.211.32 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup 253

          Notice the ip rule synonym for the          nat option.  It is valid to substitute          map-to for nat.       

D.3.5. ip rule del

          Naturally, no iproute2 tool would be complete          without the ability to undo what has been done.  With ip          rule del, individual rules can be removed from the RPDB.       

          It is at first quite confusing that the word all in          the ip rule show output needs to be replaced with          the network address 0/0.  I do not know why all is          not acceptable as a synonym for 0/0, but you'll save yourself some          headache by getting in the habit of replacing all          with 0/0.       

          By replacing the verb add in any of the command          lines above with the verb del, you can remove the          specified entry from the RPDB.       

Example D.33. Removing a NAT rule for an entire network with ip            rule del nat

[root@masq-gw]# ip rule del nat 205.254.211.32 from 192.168.100.32/29 [root@masq-gw]# ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup 253

          The ip rule utility can be a great boon in the          manipulation and maintenance of complex routers.       



[58                Please note that this is an incomplete example.  Simply put,                I'm not dealing with the issues of inbound packets or packets                destined for locally connected networks in this example.  Keep                in mind the instructional nature of this example, and plan                your own network accordingly.  For a fuller discussion of the                issues involved with handling multiple Internet links, see                Section 10.4, “Multiple Connections to the Internet”.  Note also, that there is                no corresponding network connection in the example network for                this network connection.       

posted @ 2012-01-16 15:36  balaamwe  阅读(1081)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报