﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>博客园-小戚园地-最新评论</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/CommentsRSS.aspx</link><description>Do as I want to do!</description><language>zh-cn</language><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:51:11 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:51:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>cnblogs</generator><item><title>Re:Sqlite和SQLCE在Windows Mobile 6上的性能对比</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/08/04/1535891.html#1886916</link><dc:creator>风遥</dc:creator><author>风遥</author><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 07:36:44 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/08/04/1535891.html#1886916</guid><description><![CDATA[我说的不是事物的方式 就是普通的那种 一条一条的执行 执行完一条 不进行连接对象的释放关闭  如果楼主也是这样测得话 那就很有问题了 同样的测试结果会不同
我没有去写专门的测试文章<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">风遥</a> 2010-08-04 15:36 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/08/04/1535891.html#1886916#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:Sqlite和SQLCE在Windows Mobile 6上的性能对比</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/08/04/1535891.html#1886910</link><dc:creator>YeanJay</dc:creator><author>YeanJay</author><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 07:31:14 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/08/04/1535891.html#1886910</guid><description><![CDATA[@风遥
我就是在长连接下测试的。你的测试的文章的链接看下。
egmkang写过一篇短连接的。<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">YeanJay</a> 2010-08-04 15:31 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/08/04/1535891.html#1886910#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:Sqlite和SQLCE在Windows Mobile 6上的性能对比</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/08/04/1535891.html#1886906</link><dc:creator>风遥</dc:creator><author>风遥</author><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 07:27:13 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/08/04/1535891.html#1886906</guid><description><![CDATA[开始我也是这样想的  所以我才说意外  为了谨慎起见 建议楼主自己亲自再测试一下  我是用1000条更新语句在一个事物里通过主键去更新对应的1000数据 其余测试结果跟楼主一致 
还有一点 在连接不关闭的情况下（不是那种使用完马上就释放连接对象） SQLCE要比SQLite快上不少 所以其实SQLCE并不是所有情况都比SQLite差<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">风遥</a> 2010-08-04 15:27 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/08/04/1535891.html#1886906#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:Sqlite和SQLCE在Windows Mobile 6上的性能对比</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/07/27/1535891.html#1881047</link><dc:creator>egmkang</dc:creator><author>egmkang</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:30:34 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/07/27/1535891.html#1881047</guid><description><![CDATA[[quote]风遥：楼主再去测测Update吧，别把这个漏了，很意外SQLCE要比SQLite快很多[/quote]
update就是delete+insert,sql ce怎么会比sqlite快捏??<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">egmkang</a> 2010-07-27 16:30 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/07/27/1535891.html#1881047#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:Sqlite和SQLCE在Windows Mobile 6上的性能对比</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/07/14/1535891.html#1871331</link><dc:creator>风遥</dc:creator><author>风遥</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:19:59 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/07/14/1535891.html#1871331</guid><description><![CDATA[楼主再去测测Update吧，别把这个漏了，很意外SQLCE要比SQLite快很多<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">风遥</a> 2010-07-14 17:19 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/07/14/1535891.html#1871331#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:Android菜单留痕</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/06/23/1762348.html#1854505</link><dc:creator>YeanJay</dc:creator><author>YeanJay</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:04:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/06/23/1762348.html#1854505</guid><description><![CDATA[@egmkang
谢谢啊。<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">YeanJay</a> 2010-06-23 12:04 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/06/23/1762348.html#1854505#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:Android菜单留痕</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/06/22/1762348.html#1853014</link><dc:creator>egmkang</dc:creator><author>egmkang</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:18:30 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/06/22/1762348.html#1853014</guid><description><![CDATA[注意身体啊<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">egmkang</a> 2010-06-22 09:18 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2010/06/22/1762348.html#1853014#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:基础：Out, params,ref 细说并沉淀</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2009/12/14/1623293.html#1723706</link><dc:creator>YeanJay</dc:creator><author>YeanJay</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:45:04 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2009/12/14/1623293.html#1723706</guid><description><![CDATA[@张亚
对的，哥们，是“数组”，打字打的太快了。呵呵。<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">YeanJay</a> 2009-12-14 16:45 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2009/12/14/1623293.html#1723706#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:基础：Out, params,ref 细说并沉淀</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2009/12/14/1623293.html#1723434</link><dc:creator>张亚</dc:creator><author>张亚</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:57:32 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2009/12/14/1623293.html#1723434</guid><description><![CDATA[[quote]4.params修饰符

  说白了就是一个[b]数据[/b]作为参数。

  直接看方法：[/quote]

其中的&quot;数据&quot;应该是&quot;数组&quot; 吧,差别很大噢<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">张亚</a> 2009-12-14 11:57 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2009/12/14/1623293.html#1723434#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:Sqlite和SQLCE在Windows Mobile 6上的性能对比</title><link>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2009/12/13/1535891.html#1723050</link><dc:creator>toEverybody</dc:creator><author>toEverybody</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:10:39 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2009/12/13/1535891.html#1723050</guid><description><![CDATA[[quote]YeanJay：
[quote]VERYU：
微软是拉动硬件销售的领头羊,.NEt在就给硬盘商以商机.
.NET的性能差,就给CPU等商家以商机,
不管是从那个年代起,Win98....到Vista,都是硬件的升级,但Vista失败了..所以Win7就快了点
.NET从1.1是比较小,比较快的,现在要到4.0了,同时也要硬件升级才能感觉倒的..
所以,我一般大型的项目是不用.NET和Windows的,做些小软件满足上型的企业是可以的
大型的桌面用Delphi,PB.VC++. Unix...等等 [/quote]
效率的高低并不在于所用语言和所用的开发平台，而是在于编程者的水平。我并不相信我用C#编出来的程序性能比一般的编程者用C语言编出来的程序性能低。谢谢。[/quote]


执迷不悟　吃亏是你自已<br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/" target="_blank">toEverybody</a> 2009-12-13 21:10 <a href="http://www.cnblogs.com/UpThinking/archive/2009/12/13/1535891.html#1723050#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item></channel></rss>
